Search for: "Wolpoff & Abramson"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2008, 12:18 pm
Wolpoff and Abramson, No. 07-12016, by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the court rejected Wolpoff and Abramson's argument that the Ms. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:39 pm
This includes any lawsuit filed by Wolpoff & Abramson. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 4:57 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, No. 06-1458, that a debt collection law firm was not immune from suit under FDCPA claims of wrongful debt collection action. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:12 pm
Wolpoff & Abramson (previously discussed by this blog here), the Ninth Circuit panel issued an amended Opinion that does not substantively alter the original Opinion and denied all petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:19 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit just decided Sayyed v Wolpoff and Abramson. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:19 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit just decided Sayyed v Wolpoff and Abramson. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:27 pm
Wolpoff & Abramson, No. 06-1458 (May 9, 2007), the Fourth Circuit rejected a debt-collection law firm's argument that it enjoys common-law immunity from FDCPA claims that arise out of statements made in the course of litigation. [read post]
10 May 2007, 4:37 am
WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, the Fourth Circuit dealt with the issue whether law firms are immune to claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because an alleged absolute common law immunity attaches to any statements made during the course of judicial proceedings. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:04 am
Mann Bracken was formed by the merger between Eskanos and Adler and Wolpoff and Abramson, two mega law firms that specialized in debt collection. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:14 pm
Code § 20-488, neither was its attorney of record at the time, Wolpoff and Abramson. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:14 pm
Code § 20-488, neither was its attorney of record at the time, Wolpoff and Abramson. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:12 am
Wolpoff & Abramson [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:59 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, the Fourth Circuit in an opinion by Judge Wilkinson, joined by Chief Judge Wilkins and Judge Motz, reversed the order of the district court granting the defendant law firm's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's claims brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. [read post]
10 May 2007, 6:09 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, No. 06-1458 (May 9, 2007), the Fourth Circuit rejected a debt-collection law firm's argument that it enjoys common-law immunity from FDCPA claims that arise out of statements made in the course of litigation. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:24 pm
At other times, the debt buyer will send it to a national law firm such as Wolpoff & Abramson which will then assign it to a local law firm. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:10 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir. 2003). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
Wolpoff & Abramson, 485 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2007), held that false statements made to a debtor’s attorney were actionable under the FDCPA while the Ninth Circuit reached an opposite conclusion in Guerrero v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:32 am
Wolpoff & Abramson LLP U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 2:03 pm
This site notes that Mann, Bracken is the successor by merger to Wolpoff & Abramson L.L.P., and Eskanos & Adler P.C., two collection law firms well known to debtor's lawyers. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:35 pm
Mann Bracken was a law firm focused on debt collection actions formed by the merger of three firms - Mann Bracken, LLP; Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP; and Eskanos & Adler, P.C. [read post]
