Search for: "Woods v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 8:04 am by Kathryn Moore
Attorney Richard Culbertson successfully represented several Social Security disability claimants both before the Social Security Administration and in federal court. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm by Kathryn Moore
Daniel Ortiz, representing the petitioner, Richard Culbertson, an attorney who successfully represented several Social Security disability claimants both before the Social Security Administration and in federal court, argued in favor of a separate cap. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm by Ronald Mann
In sum, the defenders of the administrative state are not entirely out of the woods. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Those individual plaintiffs appear to sue in at least three distinct capacities:  (i) as shareholders (at least in the case of Conestoga Wood); (ii) as managers, or administrators, of the companies; and (iii) in their capacities as directors, or decision-makers, of the companies. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court has also heard, or will hear, administrative law cases that will impact different aspects of securities litigation. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Barrett dissented, concluding that the Department of Homeland Security’s interpretation was reasonable. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Emily Dai
Klehm and Kurup shared an audit of the FBI’s execution of its “Woods Procedures” for FISA applications. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  In this respect, the Act resembles the Social Security Act, with one very important difference—namely, that the ACA offers employers greater discretion, a choice, about how to satisfy that social obligation. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
Andrew Keane Woods summarized and analyzed the oral arguments. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
Brooking of "LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Priess and Whipple discussed foreign policy challenges the Biden Administration has faced since January 2021, and more. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]