By: Scott B. Riddle, Esq. In Schultz v. United States, 2008 WL 2229495 (6th Cir. June 12, 2008) (pdf opinion here), the debtor argued that the Means Test violates the United States Constitution because the test is reliant on state and local income standards and deductions. Because of these deductions, eligibility under the new regime is calculated at least in part based on the state and county where the debtor resides. The housing expense deduction, for example, is governed by the county where the ... [
read post]