Search for: "v. PATTON" Results 1 - 20 of 338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 5:53 am by Ted Frank
Judge Kennedy once again dismisses the complaint in Patton Boggs v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 3:12 pm
 So the granting of the anti-SLAPP motion here gets reversed.That said, I would still rather be Patton Boggs than the plaintiff. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Patton Boggs LLP represents the plaintiffs and would like to continue to do so. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Ted Folkman
As expected, Judge Salas has ruled that Patton Boggs’s motion for an injunction enjoining Chevron’s attempt to obtain exoneration of its bond in Judge Kaplan’s court is moot in light of Judge Kaplan’s order exonerating the bond. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:02 pm by Stephen Gillers
Squire Sanders merged with Patton Boggs to form Squire Patton Boggs. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:22 pm by rtruman
Oregon Supremes Limit State’s Power to Collect a Share of Punitive Damages Verdicts :: Patton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:10 pm by David Kravets
And celebrity Lindsay Lohan sued Rockstar, the maker of Grand Theft Auto V, alleging that elements of the game tread too close to her real life. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 8:38 pm by Patent Docs
Steven Auvil and Rachael Harris of Squire Patton Boggs, and Miri Beiler of LexisNexis will consider the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Halo Electronics Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:09 pm
 The lawyer here, Santa Cruz lawyer Richard Patton, forthrightly testified in favor of Kids in the underlying suit that Guy didn't intend to benefit Second Wife in the amendment and that to the extent the amended trust did so (which it certainly seems to do), it was a scrivener's error; i.e., his bad. [read post]