Posts tagged with: "135"
Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 1:00 am by Leon Y. Lum
In Loughlin v. Ling, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision of the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences that had canceled the sole claim of Loughlin’s patent in an interference proceeding. The decision turned on the interplay between the interference statute of limitations (35 USC...   [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:00 am by Leon Y. Lum
In Loughlin v. Ling, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision of the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences that had canceled the sole claim of Loughlin’s patent in an interference proceeding. The decision turned on the interplay between the interference statute of limitations (35 USC...   [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:59 pm by Manpreet Singh Sood
Copyright Act, 1957, Sections 27(2) & 51 Plaintiff not residing or working for gain in Delhi — Territorial jurisdiction Invocation of jurisdiction of Court on the basis of vague allegations that the goods of defendants were being sold throughout the country including Delhi makes no sense [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:44 am by Kenan Farrell
Malibu Media LLC v. John Doe Court Case Number: 2:13-cv-00135-RLM-JEMFile Date: Monday, April 22, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Northern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Robert L Miller, Jr.Referred To: Magistrate Judge John E. Martin View this document on Scribd [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:53 am by Av. Şamil DEMİR
“Bir ülkenin uygarl?kta hangi düzeye ula?t???n? görmek için en iyi ölçü o memleketin avukatlar?n?n ne derece özgür olduklar?na bakmakt?r.” - Av. Faruk EREM Türk avukatlar?n mesleklerini yaparken ba?ka ülkelerdeki emsallerinden en büyük farklar?n? olu?turan düzenlemelerden biri olarak reklam yasa??m?zdan bahsedebiliriz. … Okumaya devam et ? [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:00 pm by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
Trafficking in Cannabis 25 to 2,000 893.135 Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office Major Violator's Unit investigates drug trafficking offenses in the Tampa Bay area. Charge Code DRUG2905 is used by the court system when cases involve Trafficking in Cannabis 25 to 2,000 pounds. The charge is a First Degree Felony under Florida law. 893.135 Trafficking; mandatory sentences; suspension or reduction of sentences; conspiracy to engage in trafficking. (a) Any person who knowingly sells, purchases,… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Wally Zimolong
State Representative John Taylor (the only Republican Representative from Philadelphia) has been a busy man.  First, he was elected Chairman of the Philadelphia Republican City Committee and is charged with the task of revitalizing our Party in the City.  Second, he has led the charge to expand Pennsylvania’s Act 135, otherwise known as the Abandoned and Blighted Property Conservatorship Act. What is Act 135?  Essentially, it empowers a “party in interest,” which the… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm by Av. Şamil DEMİR
Adalet Bakanl??? taraf?ndan haz?rlanarak, Ba?bakanl?k Kanunlar ve Kararlar Genel Müdürlü?ü taraf?ndan TBMM’ne sevk edilen “Türk Ceza Kanununda De?i?iklik Yap?lmas?na Dair Kanun Tasar?s?” ile  TCK’nda özel hayat?n gizlili?ini düzenleyen maddelerde ciddi de?i?iklikler yap?lmas? öngörülmektedir. Öncelikle ifade edilmelidir ki yürürlükteki TCK’n?n yedi … Okumaya devam et ? [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:19 am
A mother of two young boys and their grandmother are facing serious charges for making a 1 year old and a 5 year old little boy pose for pictures with marijuana. Leslie County, Kentucky deputies allege that grandmother Beth Hensley and mother Tracey Hensley took pictures of the two boys with marijuana joints and a large marijuana bud near their faces. The picture of each boy with the joint shows the joint in the boys' mouth while someone appears to be trying to light it. Grandmother, Beth… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:28 am by csstephens
Can I modify my spousal support payment? As Oregon divorce lawyers, we have been getting more and more questions in this economy about if spousal support can be reduced, increased, extended, or even reinstated.  A summary of the law is below, but for a more thorough analysis see our previous posts on the subject ( spousal support modification part 1, part 2, and part 3) on this subject, but a summary is below. Can spousal support be modified? Yes. In Oregon, spousal support is modifiable. The party… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm by Av. Şamil DEMİR
Adalet Bakanlığı tarafından hazırlanarak, Başbakanlık Kanunlar ve Kararlar Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından TBMM’ne sevk edilen “Türk Ceza Kanununda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Tasarısı” ile  TCK’nda özel hayatın gizliliğini düzenleyen maddelerde ciddi değişiklikler yapılması öngörülmektedir. Öncelikle ifade… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
Drug Records Thrown Out Drug Charge Defense Attorney has been researching use of medical records by police in doctor shopping cases. One court just ruled the doctor's records were inadmissible in evidence. "The state charged [the defendant] with oxycodone trafficking, contrary to subsection 893.135(1)(c)1.a., Florida Statutes (2009), and withholding information from a practitioner, which is prohibited by subsection 893.13(7)(a)8., Florida Statutes (2009). Subsection 893.13(7)(a)8. proscribes the… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
In 1977, the United States Supreme Court dealt a mortal blow to Delaware’s sequestration scheme for establishing personal jurisdiction over non-resident directors.  Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977).  Within weeks, the Delaware legislature enacted an implied consent statute for directors. Del. Code tit. 10, § 3114(a).  In 2003, the legislature amended Section 3114 to include officers as well. Nevada, in contrast, does not have an implied consent statute.  Professors Marcel Kahan and… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
In 1977, the United States Supreme Court dealt a mortal blow to Delaware’s sequestration scheme for establishing personal jurisdiction over non-resident directors.  Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977).  Within weeks, the Delaware legislature enacted an implied consent statute for directors. Del. Code tit. 10, § 3114(a).  In 2003, the legislature amended Section 3114 to include officers as well. Nevada, in contrast, does not have an implied consent statute.  Professors Marcel Kahan and… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
In 1977, the United States Supreme Court dealt a mortal blow to Delaware’s sequestration scheme for establishing personal jurisdiction over non-resident directors.  Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977).  Within weeks, the Delaware legislature enacted an implied consent statute for directors. Del. Code tit. 10, § 3114(a).  In 2003, the legislature amended Section 3114 to include officers as well. Nevada, in contrast, does not have an implied consent statute.  Professors Marcel Kahan and… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:31 am by Lewis Gainor
Under Illinois law, a criminal offense is generally classified as either a felony or a misdemeanor. The difference between felony and misdemeanor is that a felony has a penalty of one year or more imprisonment, whereas a misdemeanor is a penalty of less than one year. There are three types of misdemeanors: Class A, Class B, and Class C misdemeanor offenses. The maximum penalty for a Class A misdemeanor is up to one year incarceration as well as a fine of $2500. A Class B misdemeanor by comparison,… [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:04 am by Joe
An Easley, South Carolina man was killed around 1:30 a.m. Wednesday when he was struck by several cars on S.C. 135. The man was about a mile from his car when he was hit, according to Pickens County Coroner. The first car to strike was a 2010 Mitsubishi driven by a 23-year-old Anderson resident.  Thereafter, two other cars hit the man.  He died shortly afterward.  None of the drivers were injured in the accident.  It is further reported that the man died of blunt force… [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:17 am by Robert Reeves
An Easley, South Carolina man was killed around 1:30 a.m. Wednesday when he was struck by several cars on S.C. 135. The man was about a mile from his car when he was hit, according to Pickens County Coroner. The first car to strike was a 2010 Mitsubishi driven by a 23-year-old Anderson resident.  Thereafter, two other cars hit the man.  He died shortly afterward.  None of the drivers were injured in the accident.  It is further reported that the man died of blunt force… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Last week, I dipped a toe into the difficult topic of what happens to the attorney-client privilege in merger and acquisition transactions.  In that post, I framed a definitional question – is the attorney-client privilege an asset?  If the attorney-client privilege is an asset, an agreement that purports to transfer all of a seller’s assets would seem to include the privilege as well.  But, as I noted, there is more than a definitional question.  That question… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:12 am by Wally Zimolong
Inga Saffron details the frustration of many Philadelphians with the City’s inability to effectively deal with blighted and – - almost always — tax delinquent properties.  It is understandable that the City and government in general in unable to effectively deal with these properties.  Luckily, citizens in Pennsylvania are empowered to take action against blighted properties on there own and without the help of government bureaucrats. 68 P.S. 1101, et. seq, otherwise… [read post]