Posts tagged with: "176"
Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2012, 3:34 pm by Jason Dickstein
The FAA has issued an Advisory Circular (AC 20-176) detailing best practices for drafting Service Bulletins (SBs) related to Airworthiness Directives (ADs). Continue reading » [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:15 pm by CPC y MI Juan Gabriel Muñoz López
"La deducción personal del pudiente…" Artículo 176 fracción V LISR Autor colaborador: CPC y... Clic para leer mas en sitio original. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:05 pm by El Conta
TÍTULO IV DE LAS PERSONAS FISICAS CAPÍTULO XI DE LA DECLARACION ANUAL SECCIÓN ARTÍCULO 176 Deducciones personales autorizadas a PF Las personas físicas residentes en el país que obtengan ingresos de los señalados en este Título, para calcular su impuesto anual, podrán hacer, además de las deducciones autorizadas en cada Capítulo de esta Ley que [...] No hay posts relacionados. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Corporate lawyers are very familiar with the terms “common” and “preferred” in describing classes of corporate stock.  The use of these terms is so habitual that many lawyers may be unaware that the California legislature has taken the time to define them.  ”Common shares” are shares that “have no preference over any other shares with respect to distribution of assets on liquidation or with respect to payment of dividends”.  Cal. Corp. Code § 159. In contrast, the legislature… [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Forum selection bylaws are likely to become even more popular after this week’s decision in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corporation, C.A. No. 7220-CS (Del. Ch. June 25, 2013).  In that case, Chancellor Leo E. Strine, Jr. found that forum selection bylaws are (i) statutorily valid under 8 Del. C. § 109(b); and (ii) contractually valid and enforceable.  Even assuming that the Delaware Supreme Court agrees with Chancellor Strine, the decision is far from the… [read post]
7 May 2011, 8:34 am by emagraken
If you purchase Theft of Fire Damage coverage from ICBC and need to take advantage of this insurance can ICBC force you to provide a statement under oath before processing your claim?  The answer is yes and reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Nelson Registry, dealing with this area of the law. In this week’s case (Cort v. ICBC) the Plaintiff had fire insurance coverage with ICBC.  On September 18, 2010 his vehicle was destroyed by fire.  He asked ICBC to pay… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:31 am by emagraken
Reasons for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, addressing the issue of fault for a collision between a motorist and a child on a scooter. In last week’s case (Adams v. Zanatta) the Plaintiff, who was 9 years old at the time, suffered serious injuries in a 2006 collision.  The Plaintiff was travelling down a paved alley on a kick scooter.  At the same time the Defendant was operating a vehicle.  From the Defendant’s perspective the alley was… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:50 am by David W. White
Last week the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued an important and strongly pro-consumer decision in the case of Rhodes v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc., 461 Mass. 486 (2012). The decision erased uncertainties created by the Appeals Court decision in the same case (78 Mass. App. Ct. 518 (2010), and it affirmed the strong damages remedies available for consumers who have been wronged by unfair claims practices by insurance companies. What follows is a brief summary of the case. A more in-depth… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
Andrew will have to be careful when planning the newEU-wide ad campaign for his casinos  A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union published an intriguing decision which may be of some interest to European Mad Men and those dealing with advertising law. This was case C-176/11 HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem dd Nova Gorica, and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sre?o in turizem dd v Bundesminister für Finanzen, a reference for a preliminary ruling… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
Andrew will have to be careful when planning the newEU-wide ad campaign for his casinos  A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union published an intriguing decision which may be of some interest to European Mad Men and those dealing with advertising law. This was case C-176/11 HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem dd Nova Gorica, and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sre?o in turizem dd v Bundesminister für Finanzen, a reference for a… [read post]