Posts tagged with: "55"
Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2012, 4:42 pm
TUSTIN - A 60-year-old male driver was tragically killed in Tustin Friday after a metal object crashed through his windshield and struck him in the head. According to The Orange County Register, William Donovan of Irvine, was driving his Toyota north on state Route 55 south of McFadden Avenue when a metal object possibly coming from another vehicle, slammed through his windshield and severely injured him. Following the accident, Donovan was taken to Western Medical Center in Santa Ana, where he… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm by emagraken
I have previously detailed the potentially high financial consequences for civil breach of insurance.   One way a motorist can be in breach relates to intoxication.  If as a result of intoxication an individual is “incapable of proper control of the vehicle” then the motorist can be in breach of their insurance pursuant to Section 55(8)(a) of BC’s Insurance (Vehicle) Regulation.  This means that the individual can lose all insurance coverage and be forced to pay all damages flowing from a… [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:54 pm by Brittany Grome
Daniel Levin, Albany Government Law Review Member Introduction “[K]eeping records on innocent people is not the American way,” said New York State Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, as he urged Governor David Paterson to sign into law a bill prohibiting the use of an electronic database containing the identities of innocent stop and frisk individuals.[1] On July [...] [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Think Before You Tweet! What are the challenges for broker/dealers and investment advisers trying to use social networking sites? Complinet hosted a webinar on this topic with Clifford Kirsch from Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP and Debbie Corej, Vice President, Compliance - Insurance Division, Prudential. Clifford started the discussion by pointing out the need to think about who is using these communication tools and what they are using them for. There is not a single source for the legal… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:49 pm by Lewis B Gainor
Defendants in felony cases are subject to special rules in sentencing. Compared to misdemeanor sentencing, felonies are complicated. The court is governed by obscure rules that can sometimes produce unexpected results. And the last thing a defense attorney wants in court is to advise a client on a sentence and have something unexpected come up. When the judge determines that a penitentiary sentence is appropriate, the most important issue is whether the state’s Truth-in-Sentencing law… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Katherine C. Pearson
On the front page of the Sunday edition of the Arizona Republic, is a feature story on the "evolution" of Sun City, by writers Catherine Reagor and Lesley Wright. Even though I grew up -- and rode horses -- on... [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:57 am by Angela Casey
Important changes have been made to Rule 74 of the Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) governing applications to pass accounts, unopposed judgments on passing of account applications, and requests for increased costs. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:45 pm by Alberto Esenaro
A couple of months ago, I wrote a post called "How many OEMs do you need to amend the auto decree?", where I explored the decision of the Administration of Felipe Calderón on raising the minimum volume of production for being elegible of the benefits Read more [ ... ] [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:15 am by Katherine C. Pearson
Mark Bauer at Stetson University Law will make a presentation on the role of 55+ housing at the upcoming AALS Annual Meeting in New York City. In describing his topic, Professor Bauer comments: "Such housing communities are exempt from civilian... [read post]
Whether you might be paying child support or receiving it on behalf of your child, there are certain basics facts you need to know about child support in Illinois.  As an Illinois child support attorney, I’ve put together this overview of the Illinois law on child support as reflected in Section 505 of the Illinois Marriage and [...] [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:03 pm by Kenan Farrell
Malibu Media LLC v. John Doe Court Case Number: 2:13-cv-00055-JVB-APRFile Date: Tuesday, February 05, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Northern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Joseph S Van BokkelenReferred To: Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich View this document on Scribd [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:22 am by R. David Donoghue
Lucasfilm Ltd. v. Skywalker Outdoor, Inc., No. 10 C 733, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 11, 2011) (Conlon, J.). Judge Conlon denied defendant Skywalker Outdoor's motion to modify or vacate the default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Lucasfilm in this Lanham Act dispute. Skywalker Outdoor did not answer Lucasfilm's complaint and then did not attend the hearing on Lucasfilm's default motion. The Court entered default judgment after that hearing. First, Skywalker Outdoor received sufficient notice… [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:41 am by R. David Donoghue
Lyons Partnership, L.P. v. Welle, No. 08 C 2909, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Feb. 22, 2010) (Grady, Sen. J.). Jude Grady denied defendants' motion to set aside the Court's Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c) default judgment in this case alleging that defendants violated plaintiff's intellectual property rights in children's characters Hello Kitty, Bob the Builder and Thomas the Tank Engine, among others. While the defendants acted diligently after default was entered, they did not act diligently prior to the… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:22 am by R. David Donoghue
Lucasfilm Ltd. v. Skywalker Outdoor, Inc., No. 10 C 733, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 11, 2011) (Conlon, J.). Judge Conlon denied defendant Skywalker Outdoor's motion to modify or vacate the default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Lucasfilm in this Lanham Act dispute. Skywalker Outdoor did not answer Lucasfilm's complaint and then did not attend the hearing on Lucasfilm's default motion. The Court entered default judgment after that hearing. First, Skywalker Outdoor received sufficient notice… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:11 pm by Staff
State v. Mr. R. (Maricopa County Superior Court No. 2001093948CR) Mr. R. was engaged in an argument with his wife after they had both been drinking. He grabbed a gun because he intended to commit suicide. His wife saw him grab the gun and struggled with him, which resulted in the gun being fired inside the house (no one was injured). Police were then called and he was charged with Aggravated Assault/Dangerous against his wife. The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office originally wanted a plea… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:30 pm by Staff
(Maricopa County Superior Court No. CR2007-121024): Ms. T. had gone to a bar where she saw her 15 year old daughter drinking. She confronted her daughter later that evening, and her daughter admitted she was using methamphetamine and was very defiant. Eventually the two were involved in a physical fight which left both bleeding. The police were called and Ms. T. was arrested. Originally she was charged with a misdemeanor assault, but then the City Prosecutor dismissed charges and routed the… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:14 pm by Staff
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT FELONY 4 REDUCED to Disorderly Conduct Misdemeanor- State v. Mr. S. (Pinal County Superior Court CR2009-00829: Mr. S. was seen by multiple witnesses punch another person while at a local bar in Florence, Arizona. The victim was flown via emergency helicopter to Scottsdale Osborn Hospital where he was treated for his injuries. Mr. S., who had left the bar before the police arrived, was later contacted by police however was not immediately arrested. After completing their… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:14 pm by Staff
State v. Mr. J. (Maricopa County Superior Court No. 2003-124281CR): Mr. J. was backing his vehicle up when he struck a gate which fell on someone, resulting in a severe injury to the victim’s head and face. The police administered Field Sobriety Tests to Mr. J., and he performed poorly on them. Although he was initially charged with a Misdemeanor DUI, the prosecutor was looking into filing an Aggravated Assault Dangerous charge (which would carry a 5-15 year prison term) because a civil lawsuit… [read post]