Posts tagged with: "FDCPA"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 11:26 am
Must have experience litigating collection matters and navigating the FDCPA, FCRA, and other appli cable state and federal laws. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:49 am
As a debt collector, Asset Acceptance is frequently accused of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) as well as state [...] [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:55 am
The consumer's claim is that the law firm did not follow the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) obligation to... [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:35 am
(FDCPA). [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (”FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. 1692d makes it unlawful for a debt collector to engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 1:56 pm
As I previously wrote, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") requires that debt collectors, when communicating with a consumer, state that the communication is from a debt collector. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 10:02 am
Under the FDCPA, collection activities may resume once the collector verifies the debt and provide the debtor with a copy of the verification. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 2:05 pm
This article is not directed toward legally compliant FDCPA calls. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:03 pm
The FDCPA only requires that the debt collector cease communications with you. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm
In Jerman, plaintiff filed suit against a collection law firm alleging violations of the FDCPA, among other things, based on assertions to plaintiff by the law firm that her debts would be assumed valid unless she disputed the debt in writing, which is not required by the FDCPA. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:44 pm
This blog entry, and the case[1] it is premised upon, is important because it demonstrates that even a solid FDCPA case may fall short of satisfying all elements of concomitant state law theories. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:44 pm
This blog entry, and the case[1] it is premised upon, is important because it demonstrates that even a solid FDCPA case may fall short of satisfying all elements of concomitant state law theories. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:19 am
Falsely represent that you committed a crime in order to disgrace you These are just some of the provisions of the FDCPA. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
To allow otherwise would thwart enforcement of the FDCPA and undermine its purpose. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
To allow otherwise would thwart enforcement of the FDCPA and undermine its purpose. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
A consumer can collect their actual damages for violations of the FDCPA, but very few consumers have out-of-pocket, actual damages for FDCPA violations. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:33 am
In addition, the CFPB alleges BounceBack’s FDCPA violations constituted violations of the CFPA. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:30 am
In its en banc decision, the Third Circuit distinguished the language in FDCPA Section 1692g(a)(4) and (a)(5) and 1692g(b) from the language in Section 1692g(a)(3). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:47 am
In addition, it notes that the CFPB filed amicus briefs in three cases related to the FDCPA. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:23 am
The FDCPA's fraudulent transfer provisions are not written in terms of legal and rightful ownership. [read post]
