Posts tagged with: "FDCPA"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
Therefore the court characterized as "false on its face" a debt collector's form notice telling the FDCPA plaintiff here (and a group of almost 200 others) to pay up because discharge was unavailable. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm
Carlisle, the Court ruled that if a debt collector makes an incorrect statement of law during communications with a debtor, in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), the debt collector cannot claim they merely misinterpreted the FDCPA in order to shield themselves from a lawsuit. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 11:14 am
There’s never been a better argument for updating the FDCPA to give it some teeth. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:49 am
Usually collectors who use this unfair strategy will insult you, curse you, or otherwise violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:15 am
If the creditor was on notice that she was not liable and continued to make collection attempts, this would be a violation.If you live in Indiana and think you might have a FDCPA case, please give me a call. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:44 am
The FDCPA gives consumers rights to be treated fairly, honestly and with respect. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:59 am
Lots of harassment can violate the FDCPA. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm
Judges would be allowed under the bill to issue injunctions to stop violations of the FDCPA. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:52 pm
Our next post in this series will address what is a violation of the FDCPA. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
The reason for this was a peculiarity in the FDCPA which capped damages in any class action at one percent of a company's net worth in . [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:28 am
Grubek, through her lawsuit, claimed that all three communications violated the FDCPA. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:05 am
The last time the justices heard an FDCPA case (last term’s Sheriff v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 1:21 pm
” In its Petition, Firstsource argued that the second CID should be set aside for reasons that included: (1) the FDCPA violations asserted by the Bureau are not actionable under the bona fide error rule, (2) the issuance of the CID was outside the Bureau’s Dodd-Frank authority because it had not identified (and cannot identify) any legally cognizable reason to believe Firstsource violated the FDCPA, (3) the Notification of Purpose was written in a vague and formulaic… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:29 pm
It’s important to note that other provisions of the FDCPA apply to deceased debt. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:50 pm
The facsimile in question is not a “communication” under the FDCPA. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:44 pm
” The appellate court further opined, “The FDCPA is a consumer protection statute and was intended to permit, even encourage, attorneys like Lemberg to act as private attorney generals to pursue FDCPA claims. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:16 am
The FDCPA targets abusive or deceptive conduct by debt collectors. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:07 am
This was held to be a violation of the FDCPA. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:42 am
It is now 8 days until “Regulation F” of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) takes effect on November 30. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:16 am
Based upon several procedural defects in the letter, the couple launched a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) claim against the collection agency and its law firm. [read post]
