Posts tagged with: "employment-digest"
Results 1 - 20 of 580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2016, 3:49 am by Robin Shea
But to keep things digestible on this blog, I’m going to do a series of posts (three in all, I think, but I might need four) on the highlights. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Parsons & Associates, PC
You may also have a third party claim against non-employers whose negligence or failures to fulfill their obligations caused the lead exposure to occur. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 12:19 pm by Leslie Gaines, Attorney
Upon careful review of the VA’s rating schedule for the digestive system, I note that there are other VA diagnostic codes which take into consideration fecal “leakage” and impairment in sphincter control. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 3:42 pm by Stuart Blake
This way the employer can make sure everyone has received the same training. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:21 pm by Bari Burke
 One broad field in which many of them find employment is in analyzing, digesting and classifying the decisions of the Federal and State courts which have been handed down during the ten years ended with 1906. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 3:53 am by Jeremy Saland
For further information on these crimes, as well as the Federal Computer Crime and Cyber Crime statute of 18 United States Code 1030, go to CrottySaland.Com where there is easily digestible information on these offenses. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:33 am by Kelly Buchanan
Acts of the Parliament of Tasmania (1857-1981) Statute Law of Tasmania (1982-) Indexes to the Legislation of Tasmania Statutory Rules (Tasmania) (1954-) We also hold law reports for the Supreme Court of Tasmania: Digest of Cases Decided in Tasmania (1856-1896) Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Tasmania (1897-1904) Tasmanian Law Reports: Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Tasmania (1905-1940) State Reports, Tasmania (1941-1953) Tasmanian State Reports (1954-1978)… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
") about AB 465 (Legislative Counsel's Digest here), which would have enacted Labor Code section 925, providing, inter alia, as follows: No person may require another person, as a condition of employment, to agree to the waiver of any legal right, penalty, forum, or procedure for any employment law violations; no person may threaten, retaliate, or discriminate against another person based on a refusal to agree to such waiver; any such waiver required as a… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by Michael Thomas
This case was digested by Emily M. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by Michael Thomas
This case was digested by Kora Paciorek and edited by David W. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
As stated in Legislative Counsel's Digest: Existing law prohibits an employer from requiring an employee to work during any meal or rest or recovery period mandated by an applicable statute or specified regulation, standard, or order, establishes penalties for an employer’s failure to provide a mandated meal or rest or recovery period, and requires rest or recovery periods to be counted as hours worked. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:06 am by Robin Shea
I will have a comprehensive post on the proposed GINA rule as soon as I have a chance to read and digest it, but it looks like it is going to have some good news for employers. [read post]