Posts tagged with: "employment-digest" Results 41 - 60 of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
Dreyfus Corp., 10 N.Y.3d 555, 853 N.Y.S.2d 270 (2008), is discussed in the New York State Bar Association’s New York Law Digest, No. 580 (April 2008), edited by David E. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 11:04 am
I’m still digesting the opinion as are other bloggers in Connecticut. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:35 am
I will digest the Court's unanimous Brinker opinion a bit later. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
As stated in Legislative Counsel's Digest: Existing law prohibits an employer from requiring an employee to work during any meal or rest or recovery period mandated by an applicable statute or specified regulation, standard, or order, establishes penalties for an employer’s failure to provide a mandated meal or rest or recovery period, and requires rest or recovery periods to be counted as hours worked. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 The plaintiff admitted in discovery that he drove or rode in his employer's vehicles on 90 percent of his workdays. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The court noted that deposition testimony had established that the Plaintiff had lost employment and had difficulty obtaining and maintaining employment due to his chronic marijuana use. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 5:42 am
I really haven't digested the details of the new OSHA regulation on personal protective equipment, but here's a link to the final rule: Employer Payment for Personal Protective Equipment; Final Rule.What I was struck by was the commentary I read elsewhere summarized in this opening paragraph about the history of this regulation (emphasis and bracketed material added by me):In 1999 [March 31], OSHA issued a proposal to require employers to pay for all protective… [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:23 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The folks in the Bay Area have been so busy flexing their employment law muscles that we’ve split this summary into two easily digestible posts to provide what you’ll need to hop on the trolley to compliance city. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Amended section 2699.3(c)(2)(B)(ii): provides: No employer may avail himself or herself of the notice and cure provisions of this subdivision with respect to alleged violations of paragraph (6) or (8) of subdivision (a) of Section 226 more than once in a 12-month period for the same violation or violations contained in the notice, regardless of the location of the worksite.Legislative Counsel’s digest is available here. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:11 am by Daniel Schwartz
I’ve had a little more time to digest the latest memo from the NLRB opining on what is and what isn’t appropriate for employers to have in their policies. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:54 pm by Jack Bogdanski
His cover story at the time was that he was the Philippines circulation manager for Reader's Digest. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:37 am
By the time you try digesting everything on your plate, yo... [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 9:51 am by Matt Rita
Litigation Value: No immediate employment law liability. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
As such, the Complaint was dismissed.Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 5:48 am
Maybe they'll take a break over the holidays so I can properly digest all of this stuff. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 11:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:17 am by Shaunna Mireau
I was at the CBA Alberta Law Conference last week and attended the Labour and Employment session on Friday afternoon. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions. [read post]