Posts tagged with: "employment-digest"
Results 41 - 60 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2007, 5:42 am
I really haven't digested the details of the new OSHA regulation on personal protective equipment, but here's a link to the final rule: Employer Payment for Personal Protective Equipment; Final Rule.What I was struck by was the commentary I read elsewhere summarized in this opening paragraph about the history of this regulation (emphasis and bracketed material added by me):In 1999 [March 31], OSHA issued a proposal to require employers to pay for all protective… [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:23 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The folks in the Bay Area have been so busy flexing their employment law muscles that we’ve split this summary into two easily digestible posts to provide what you’ll need to hop on the trolley to compliance city. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 9:51 am by Matt Rita
Litigation Value: No immediate employment law liability. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:17 am by Shaunna Mireau
I was at the CBA Alberta Law Conference last week and attended the Labour and Employment session on Friday afternoon. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:04 pm by Maggy Baccinelli
Information was digestible and applicable, but the program’s real highlight was its incredible range of perspectives. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:53 am
States will receive 100 percent of the FMAP 2014-2016, 95 percent in 2017, 94 percent in 2018, and 90 percent after See H.R. 2668 Digest. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:54 pm by Michael Schmidt
On the issue of enforceable social media policies maintained by employers, we have discussed, dissected, and digested plenty of opinions from the Office of the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”).   [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
An employee who alleged that she was twice demoted and ultimately terminated because she suffered from diverticulitis, a digestive disease correlated with advanced age, failed to show that her employer discriminated against her because of her age and not because of some age-correlated factor, a federal district court in Texas ruled in dismissing the claim on summary judgment (Nadeau v Echostar, October 30, 2013, Cardone, K). [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:12 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
He places this examination in the context surrounding each codification, and the legal history of both societies.Cairns offers a detailed analysis of family law and employment in the two codes, showing how their respective redactors selected from a defined range of sources and materials to construct their codes. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:17 am
Here, digest some Lawffice Links to keep you up to speed:The big news from last week was that SCOTUS granted certiorari in two of the "contraception mandate" cases: Sebelius v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:28 am
 All posts are sent to members as a daily digest from the communities, unless a member changes his or her settings to real-time delivery. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:28 am
 All posts are sent to members as a daily digest from the communities, unless a member changes his or her settings to real-time delivery. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:40 am
The employer isn't required to guess whether a reasonable accommodation is needed. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:30 am
Limit to one page No matter your qualifications, a prospective employer wants an easily digestible synopsis on your work history and experience. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:19 am
Kutztown University (opinion here) (let's pause for a moment so my non-attorney readers can digest that an opinion that was just published is "unpublished"). [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:05 pm by niannacci
Curiously, diversity is not one of those criteria, and while employment is considered a factor, the specific type of employment is not a consideration in the rankings. [read post]