Posts tagged with: "employment-digest"
Results 41 - 60 of 631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 10:03 am by Anthony Zaller
The DOL’s Final Rule was issued this week (see my previous article for the details), and we have had a few days to digest the new rules. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:06 pm
 He also was intermittently absent for digestive problems to the tune of about four weeks. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:41 am by BDG
You, reader, are in the wrong place for the debate over how law schools should present employment data. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:11 am by Daniel Schwartz
I’ve had a little more time to digest the latest memo from the NLRB opining on what is and what isn’t appropriate for employers to have in their policies. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 11:04 am
I’m still digesting the opinion as are other bloggers in Connecticut. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
As stated in Legislative Counsel's Digest: Existing law prohibits an employer from requiring an employee to work during any meal or rest or recovery period mandated by an applicable statute or specified regulation, standard, or order, establishes penalties for an employer’s failure to provide a mandated meal or rest or recovery period, and requires rest or recovery periods to be counted as hours worked. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 5:42 am
I really haven't digested the details of the new OSHA regulation on personal protective equipment, but here's a link to the final rule: Employer Payment for Personal Protective Equipment; Final Rule.What I was struck by was the commentary I read elsewhere summarized in this opening paragraph about the history of this regulation (emphasis and bracketed material added by me):In 1999 [March 31], OSHA issued a proposal to require employers to pay for all protective… [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:23 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The folks in the Bay Area have been so busy flexing their employment law muscles that we’ve split this summary into two easily digestible posts to provide what you’ll need to hop on the trolley to compliance city. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Amended section 2699.3(c)(2)(B)(ii): provides: No employer may avail himself or herself of the notice and cure provisions of this subdivision with respect to alleged violations of paragraph (6) or (8) of subdivision (a) of Section 226 more than once in a 12-month period for the same violation or violations contained in the notice, regardless of the location of the worksite.Legislative Counsel’s digest is available here. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:37 am
By the time you try digesting everything on your plate, yo... [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 9:51 am by Matt Rita
Litigation Value: No immediate employment law liability. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:17 am by Shaunna Mireau
I was at the CBA Alberta Law Conference last week and attended the Labour and Employment session on Friday afternoon. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:04 pm by Maggy Baccinelli
Information was digestible and applicable, but the program’s real highlight was its incredible range of perspectives. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:53 am
States will receive 100 percent of the FMAP 2014-2016, 95 percent in 2017, 94 percent in 2018, and 90 percent after See H.R. 2668 Digest. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Existing law prohibits an employer from requiring an employee or applicant for employment to agree, in writing, to any term or condition that is known by the employer to be illegal. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:49 am by Robin Shea
But to keep things digestible on this blog, I’m going to do a series of posts (three in all, I think, but I might need four) on the highlights. [read post]