Posts tagged with: "employment-digest"
Results 81 - 100 of 494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by Simon Fodden
An interesting excerpt from the judgment of the court, delivered by Kennedy J., which I have not had the time to digest: The Court must proceed with care when considering the whole concept of privacy expectations in communications made on electronic equipment owned by a government employer. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:06 am by Howell and Christmas, LLC
Under the Industrial Insurance Act, the City of Spokane was immune from the suit, despite being the employer of the deceased worker and the two others injured in the accident. [read post]
14 May 2014, 3:30 am by David DePaolo
In the past I have opined that presumptions more often than not, in workers' compensation cases, result in more litigation rather than lessen the burden.The reason is largely psychological - there are many employers, even in government settings where most presumptions seem to apply, who feel offended for some reason when an employee gets to receive benefits under the name of workers' compensation when the qualification seems tenuous.A recent Colorado Court of Appeals case… [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 2:26 pm by admin
 The Legislative Digest is currently available to the public. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 5:04 am
The body systems listed include the neurological, immunological, muscular and skeletal, respiratory, speech, reproductive, digestive, urinary, lymphatic, skin, and endocrine systems. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:31 am by On the Net
Related posts:A Digestible Overview of Health Care Reform for Employers White House Reports Says 51% of Employers to Lose Healthcare Plans under Obamacare Health Insurers Seeking Rate Hikes Of More Than 20 Percent In Connecticut [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:51 am
Once we’ve digested the entire submission from the Department of Labor, we will report back with more detailed analysis of the most significant changes. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:48 pm
I'll be posting updates on further specifics as we digest this massive document but as I said before, the new regulations will not take effect until January 16, 2009. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:07 pm
The Supreme Court today handed employers a victory with its decision today in Gross v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 7:53 pm
An experienced employment lawyer can walk you through this process. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:41 pm
Molly DiBianca at the Delaware Employment Law Blog digests recent polling data on office romances. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm by HR Hero Alerts
Substantial news for employers to digest is that they must provide an off-duty meal break within five hours of the start of an employee’s shift but need not force-feed an employee who refuses to take it. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 3:27 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 The answer is "NO"  -- as long as political influence and hackery is kept out of the equation and algorithms digesting state- and employer-fed job openings and hiring data are allowed to produce up-to-the-minute reports of shortage occupations. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Louis Mirando
The Abridgment’s Australian counterpart is the Australian Digest. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:11 pm
Because I'm traveling today, I'll post a further update early next week after I've had a chance to digest the full decision (85 pages) and all of the dissents but I've been trying to determine the immediate impact for employers in the state. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:18 pm by On the Net
Related posts: Obamacare Arguments: Day 1 A Digestible Overview of Health Care Reform for Employers Amicus Brief in the Virginia Case Challenging the Constitutionality of the Obama Health Care Plan [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 11:40 am by Matt C. Bailey
It would specify that its provisions do not affect the requirements for meal periods for certain other employees or employers. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:50 am
The views expressed within a blawg post are those of the author, and unless otherwise noted, do not reflect the views of the author's employer or the other authors writing on this blawg. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:28 am by On the Net
The reason for the increases is the new federal health reform mandates, according to Anthem and the state Department of Insurance” Related posts:Obamacare Killing Many Types of Health Insurance Plans Health Insurers Seeking Rate Hikes Of More Than 20 Percent In Connecticut A Digestible Overview of Health Care Reform for Employers [read post]