Posts tagged with: "misleading+or+deceptive+conduct"
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 1:33 am by war
Following on from yesterday’s post, @davidstarkoff points out that: the transcript of the special leave application can be found here; and in due course, the submissions will appear here. The hearing of the appeal has been fixed for 11 September 2012. Share on Facebook [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:20 am by war
Apparently, back on 25 June the High Court granted Google special leave to appeal from the Full Federal Court’s ruling that Google is liable for the misleading ads placed by advertisers. Maybe the internet will be able to keep working in Australia after all. Austlii is only up to 20 June, at the time of posting. Lid dip “Law Geek Down Under“ Share on Facebook [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:39 am by war
The Federal Court, Middleton J, has rejected Bodum’s allegations that the sale of the Baccarat Venice coffee plunger and Euroline’s Classic coffee plunger passed off Bodum’s Chambord coffee plunger or was otherwise misleading or deceptive; or Baccarat’s Devon teapot passed off Bodum’s Assam Tea Press or was otherwise misleading or deceptive. Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Peter Bodum A/S [2010] FCA 23 The judgment includes depictions of the products and their packaging in the… [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:50 pm by war
The High Court has unanimously allowed Google’s appeal from the Full Federal Court’s ruling that Google was liable for misleading or deceptive statements in sponsored links. According to the Court’s summary (pdf): The High Court unanimously allowed the appeal. Google did not create the sponsored links that it published or displayed. Ordinary and reasonable users of the Google search engine would have understood that the representations conveyed by the sponsored links were those of… [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:39 am by war
The Full Federal Court in Australia does. The ACCC has successfully appealed the Google Adwords case for misleading and deceptive conduct. So, for example, Alpha Dog Trainging has been operating a dogtraining business for 12 years. Dog Training Australia (Ausdog) bought ads on the keywords Alpha Dog Training through Google’s Adwords program. One ad generated was: Alpha Dog Training  DogTrainingAustralia.com.au All Breeds. We come to you. No dog that can’t be trained. Instead of being taken… [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:38 am by
AG Sorrell looks nice...Back in May, Vermont's Attorney General William H. Sorrell took a tough stance on a patent troll called MPJH, which Mr Sorrell accused of harassing Vermont residents by threatening them with patent infringement lawsuits that MPJH had not reasonably substantiated. Now Mr Sorrell again defends his local residents against deceptive practices undertaken by companies leveraging IP rights.  In this instance, the AG's target was a New York-based company… [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:47 pm
In the early hours of every morning, this Kat performs a ritual which will be very familiar to some readers. She (a) takes her clean cafetiere from the cupboard; (b) adds two big scoops of ground Italian coffee; (c) adds boiling water; (d) pushes the plunger down and, (e) hopes for the best. Accordingly, she has been reading with interest the recent decision in Australia concerning an alleged case of misleading and deceptive conduct and passing off between two manufacturers of cafetieres. Peter… [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:21 pm by war
If you have tried to buy, sell or rent property in Australia in the last 10 years (at the least!), like some nearly 7 million other Australians you have no doubt come across realestate.com.au, the web-portal run by REA Group. Real One also competes in that space.[1] Bromberg J has held that Real One’s logos: Real One 2nd logo Real One 1st logo did not “pass off”[2] REA Group’s logos: Nor did they infringe REA Group’s registered trade mark: [3] TM No… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:04 pm by war
The Full Court has partially allowed an appeal from Foster J’s decision to order Knott Investments to stop using the Winnebago trade marks for “campers” or RVs not made by Winnebago. As a result, Knott can continue to use “Winnebago” if it can make it clear it is not associated with the Winnebago company. Some facts From about 1959, Winnebago had been making and selling its RVs under that brand name in the USA and eventually other countries including the UK and Canada,… [read post]