Posts tagged with: "privacy"
Results 1 - 20 of 63,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 8:13 am by Jon Brodkin
(credit: Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images) Internet privacy advocates are mourning the death of online privacy rules, but yesterday's House vote to eliminate the consumer protections was celebrated by ISPs, advertisers, and Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:32 am by Ed Felten
Notice that we had to make all of these decisions, and face the attendant unpleasant tradeoffs, before we even reached the question of how to design the technical mechanism to implement key escrow, and how that would affect the security and privacy interests of law-abiding users. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:31 am by Daniel Schwartz
 And the first step in that is that HR should learn the basics of data privacy. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:25 am by Jonathan Bailey
A Note on Privacy With Facebook, not every post, image or link is public. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:13 am by Miracle Jones
The US House of Representatives[official site] on Tuesday voted [results] to repeal Internet privacy regulations. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:58 am by Michael Geist
-based surveillance and the subordination of privacy protections for non-U.S. citizens and residents. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:26 am
It’s an old idea: For decades, in both Republican and Democratic administrations, federal rules have protected the privacy of the information in a telephone call. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Hall
NYTimes: Republicans Attack Internet Privacy (Editorial): Republicans just made clear how little they care about protecting the privacy of Americans by letting companies like Verizon and Comcast sell advertisers the internet browsing histories and other personal data of their customers … Continue reading → [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:29 am by Kevin
LEGAL DISCIPLINESPrivacy/Data Protection/CybersecurityEU Data Privacy Rules and Penalties Reach America: Are You Ready? [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This is because in the case of those privileges, either a professional rule of confidentiality (for attorneys and priests) or a custom of privacy (in marriage) already protects the secrecy of the communications at issue, and the privilege simply ensures that the pre-existing privacy protection does not suffer from the lack of a corresponding privilege. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:10 pm by Hall
WaPo: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections by Brian Fung: House Republicans voted overwhelmingly Tuesday, by a margin of 215-205, to repeal a set of landmark privacy protections for Web users, issuing a … Continue reading → [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 2:57 pm by Jon Brodkin
That would make the death of the Federal Communications Commission's privacy rules official. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 2:14 pm by Robert E. Braun
Companies often identify certain “privacy priority” parts of their business, but fail to identify all of the areas in which privacy is implicated. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:58 pm by Bradley Shear
These thoughts were reinforced when I read the App’s Privacy Policy. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm by Mark Ashton
G.J.P. 146 A.3d 204, holding that Pennsylvania’s grandparent custody statute offended principles of privacy and was partially if not wholly unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm by Stewart Baker
Stephanie Roy notes that Congress has begun the process of repealing the ISP privacy and security regulations adopted under Chairman Wheeler. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Darius Whelan
., Heritage Hotel, Portlaoise Tue. 9 May 2017:ICEL Data Protection and Privacy Conference, Dublin Tue. 9 May 2017 01:00 PM:  Practical Conveyancing: A Review of Recent Developments - Legal Seminar - CPD Accredited., Dublin [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:59 pm by Staci Zaretsky
An online duel between a privacy lawyer and a T14 consumer protection professor? [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 10:35 am by Shawn Hamp
 A driver may not want to submit to a blood tests because they fear needles or have privacy concerns. [read post]