Posts tagged with: "privacy"
Results 61 - 80 of 59,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 5:01 pm by Conner O'Keefe
Well it’s Tuesday and we got a story on a federal judge who came down with the hammer on a former baseball executive whom was caught hacking into a former colleague and competitors scouting database. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:56 pm by Jeffrey Vagle
Some of the current fringe benefits provided by some technologies, such as increased privacy, enhanced security, and more frequent updates, all tend to be found in higher-end technologies that are often unaffordable to those with limited incomes. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:46 pm by Andrea Babinec
Does anyone, according to Judge Morgan’s logic, have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their IP address? [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:21 pm by Media Law Prof
Banta, Valparaiso University Law School, is publishing Death and Privacy in the Digital Age in volume 94 of North Carolina Law Review (2016). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:29 am by Howard Friedman
Their edict to the states concerning restrooms, locker rooms, and other facilities is at once illegal, dangerous, and ignores privacy issues. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:47 am by Cody Fierro*
  [1] Forbes, 15 Noteworthy Facts About Wearable In 2016 [2] DLA Piper, Wearables at work: Data privacy and employment law implication [3] KFF, Workplace Wellness Programs Characteristics and Requirements [4] LivePlan, Do Corporate Wellness Programs Really Work [5] The Wall Street Journal, As Wearables in Workplace Spread, So Do Legal Concerns [6] Entrepreneur, Wearable Tech Is Improving Employee Productivity and Happiness [7] CIO, 14 ways to improve corporate wellness… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:07 am by Media Law Prof
Chris Jay Hoofnagle, University of California, Berkeley, School of Information Science; University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, has published US Regulatory Values and Privacy Consequences: Implications for the European Citizen at 2 European Data Protection Law Review 169 (2016).... [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:22 am by Sam Rogers
Second, whether the seizure was an unreasonable intrusion on that expectation of privacy. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Winston Maxwell and Timothy Tobin
Initially, member state initiatives focused on protecting consumer privacy in connected cars. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Denise Lash
The trial court determined that the unauthorized police visits constituted trespassing and an infringement on the privacy rights of the accused. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:40 am by Graham Smith
This expansion may provide further grounds of challenge, whatever the final decision of the Court in Watson/Tele2.Further grounds could include not only privacy and data protection issues, but also intrusion into freedom of expression. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 5:59 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Journal Sentinel] * The recent outcome of the Microsoft data privacy case is a great example of what can happen when the law can no longer keep up with technology. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:30 am by Godwhacker
Trump has encouraged the use of torture and blatantly disregarded privacy protections that have been enshrined in the founding document since the 18th century. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:47 am by INFORRM
 There are powerful arguments – under both data protection and privacy law – that such protection should be provided in appropriate cases. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:47 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
 First, it puts jurors on notice that they might be investigated online, which in turn allows jurors time to strengthen their social media privacy settings. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:46 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Because this legislative proposal would require amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), one potential avenue for consideration of the proposal would be in the context of current ECPA reform efforts. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:30 pm
FTC Approves Final Order in Vipvape APEC Cross Border Privacy Rule Case After a public comment period, the Federal Trade Commission has approved a final order resolving the Commission’s complaint against Very Incognito Technologies, Inc., doing business as Vipvape, alleging that it deceived consumers about its participation in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) system. [read post]