Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 1 - 20 of 227,349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2015, 8:00 pm by Mathias Link
The Supreme Court of Canada set out the test for determining whether or not an employee has been constructively dismissed in 1997 in Farber v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 7:56 pm by Francis Pileggi
The post Supreme Court Interprets Advance Notice Bylaws appeared first on Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 7:00 pm
 In their petition, Google urged the Supreme Court to limit the the circumstances in which software makers are able to wield copyright law to restrict the use of basic software commands (an argument not out of kilter in the SEP/FRAND patent landscape). [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:54 pm
SECTION 30-6-1 NMSA 1978 ABUSE OF A CHILD Harm to child Age of child Mens rea of defendant UJI No death or great bodily harm Under 18 Intentional or reckless disregard 14-612 Great bodily harm Under 18 Intentional or reckless disregard 14-615 Death At least 12 but less than 18 Intentional or reckless disregard 14-621 Under 12 Reckless disregard 14-622 Under 12 Intentional 14-623 Under 12 (step-… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:44 pm
Note to all criminal defense lawyers representing juveniles who are currently representing children charged as a "serious youthful offender":File your motions now in district court reserving your right to argue any remedies our Supreme Court may issue in the case discussed in the article below.And, it may be wise to ask for a "stay" while this issue gets decided by the… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:26 pm by Wystan Ackerman
Robins, to be decided by the Supreme Court next Term (see my May 1 blog post for more on that) a session on managing media relations in class actions by Richard Levick (I heard him speak on this subject several years ago and he was excellent). [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:08 pm by Leland E. Beck
Two significant actions in regulatory affairs in the week past, other than United States Supreme Court decision, are worth note. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 3:49 pm
The online consolidated Supreme Court Civil Rules has not as of today been updated to include the changes, but you can find them in B.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 2:27 pm by OfficialSOIssues
When the Supreme Court sided with the the... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm by Steve Graham
After 13 years the Mississippi Supreme Court has finally conceded that Jeffrey Havard is entitled to a hearing at the trial court level on whether or not the new evidence about the expert witness Steven Hayne’s testimony warrants a new trial. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Aaron Weems
When the Supreme Court rendered their 5-4 ruling on June 26, 2015 in the same-sex marriage case Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 1:11 pm by D. Scott Crook
As a lawyer and a religious person, I was deeply concerned about the Supreme Court’s recent decision regarding same-sex marriage. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 12:12 pm by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
In Bullcoming, the Supreme Court held that the actual chemist who tested the defendant’s blood must be present in court for cross-examination. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:34 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
To expand access to justice, state supreme courts, state bar associations, admitting authorities, and other regulators should devise and consider for adoption new or improved frameworks for licensing or otherwise authorizing providers of legal and related services. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:33 am
"A Gay Couple's Love, in Life and Death, Goes to the Supreme Court": Samantha Stark has this post (with video) today at the "Lens" blog of The New York Times. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:30 am
Supreme Court scrutiny": Columnist Steve Blow has this essay in today's edition of The Dallas Morning News. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:28 am
"Time for TV in the Supreme Court": This editorial appeared in Thursday's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:35 am by Rick Garnett
Here is a new, short book from West (edited by Brad Wilson) that includes my chapter on Rehnquist's religious-freedom and church-state work: It might not have been foreseen that William Rehnquist would have a marked influence on the Supreme Court’s interpretation, construction, and application of the First Amendment’s Religion Clauses. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:26 am by Lou M
 This, of course, was precisely what GINA was aimed at, but the court, apparently using proper methods of statutory construction, and not the Supreme Court's method in the Obamacare decision, went with the plain language of the statute. [read post]