Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 1 - 20 of 214,584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Timothy P. Flynn
His conviction was therefore dismissed and his sentence was vacated.These and other aspects of the immunity provision contained in the Medical Marijuana Act were recently argued before the Michigan Supreme Court in three consolidated cases from Oakland County; a decision is expected later this [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 7:00 am by Sebastian Brady
Ingrid Wuerth broke the news that the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in another case involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and briefly summarized what issues will be presented to the Court and what the significance of the case will be. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:47 am by John Day
” The Supreme Court then took up the issue on appeal. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:41 am by John Day
” The Supreme Court then took up the issue on appeal. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:29 am by Dean Freeman
The appellate court reversed, and the state supreme court affirmed that reversal and remanded the case for trial. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 5:01 am by SHG
Sullum notes the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Economist article also stated, “After the Supreme Court ruled in 1987 that Native American Tribes, being sovereign, could not be barred from allowing gambling, casinos began popping up on reservations everywhere. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Paul Berghoff of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, Andrei Iancu of Irell & Manella LLP, and Kevin Rhodes of 3M Innovative Properties Co. will untangle the predictions and give their own best analysis regarding the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Teva v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
From the Consumer Law & Policy Blog: historical perspectives on the Supreme Court's current Fair Housing Act case (here and here). [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:04 pm by John Mesirow
Hell, The Juice would rather see the cops set up a DUI checkpoint, even though they are unconstitutional, regardless of what the Supreme Court said. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm by Schachtman
When the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:26 pm by Karren Kenney
In 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled the contested case proper, forever altering the understanding of “the right to remain silent. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:16 pm by Michael Kraut
Supreme Court has previously ruled that pressing or exigent circumstances do not provide officers with a reason to forego consent, except under some circumstances. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 4:55 pm by Robert Guest
Now the Supreme Court has held that cell phone data is protected and the police must have a warrant to search your phone, but Constitutional protections tend to find exceptions (we have a drug war to fight, and most judges are on the side of the Government), also most snitch deals are never seen in court and LEO may look at your phone anyway just to see who is in your network of friends without intending to use the evidence in court. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 4:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
In a recent case decided by the South Dakota Supreme Court, a sister and brother were co-trustees of a family trust established by the siblings’ parents. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Jeffrey Forrest and Tiffany Duong
  This approach would seem to be more in keeping with the California Supreme Court’s determination in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:48 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Previously, EPIC petitioned the Supreme Court, with the support of dozens of legal experts, arguing that the NSA program was unlawful. [read post]