Posts tagged with: "supreme+court"
Results 1 - 20 of 206,446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
"The Supreme Court's devotees go DIY": Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 2:06 pm
"2014 Supreme Court Roundup: An explanation of the Court's affirmations of our right not to go along. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:57 pm by Joe Koncelik
Do you believe this is a stream that has a "significant nexus" to a navigable waterway (current test established under Rapanos by Supreme Court Justice Kennedy) Is it reasonable to require a Federal Section 404 and State 401 Water Quality Permit in order to fill this drainage way adjacent to the road? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:51 pm by Shantanu Naravane
Both of these propositions are not entirely settled under English law, with no conclusive House of Lords / Supreme Court decision on either point. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:24 pm by Howard Knopf
It will normally almost certainly pass the six factor test of fairness laid down by the Supreme Court of Canada.Now, it seems that the budget implementation Bill C-43, introduced on October 23, 2014 the day after the tragic terrorist event at the National War Memorial and in Parliament Hill, is devoid of any references to the amendments to the Copyright Act. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:15 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's recent 5 a.m. order in a Texas voting rights case was... [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:05 pm by Stikeman Elliott LLP
 Federal Capital Markets Stability Act Introduction In the Securities Act Reference, the Supreme Court of Canada made it clear that the federal government had jurisdiction  to regulate activities that increase or create systemic risk in Canadian financial markets. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:57 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Despite success in the lower courts, the Supreme Court ruled against Aereo, sending the case back to the lower court. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:44 pm by M. Hedayat & Associates, P.C.
.), 950 N.E.2d 1109 (2011), 242 Ill.2d 231 (Feb. 25, 2011), the Illinois Supreme Court ruled on the thorny problem of how to apportion proceeds from a foreclosure sale between the mortgagee bank and mechanics lien claimants when there weren’t enough proceeds arising from the foreclosure sale to pay both in full. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 11:55 am by John Steele
One of the overarching questions that the Supreme Court of California must address is whether the law governing lawyers should... [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 11:51 am by Angelo Gentile
Taxpayer’s Arguments On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Ms. [read post]
As some Nova Scotia residents may know, proving negligence in a medical malpractice case can be a huge challenge due to Canada's Supreme Court rulings that established certain liability limits and restrictions on such cases. [read post]
This is up from 12 states before we helped Edie Windsor strike down the Defense of Marriage Act in the Supreme Court last June. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 11:16 am by ccox
Outside interest groups, often with high-stakes economic interests or political causes before the courts, now routinely pour millions of dollars into state supreme court elections. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:53 am by Legal Profession Prof
An attorney who is not regularly engaged in the practice of law but rather serves as chief financial officer of the Charleston Academy of Beauty Culture ("CABC") was suspended for three months by the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.... [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:44 am by Native American Rights Fund
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2014-2015update.htmlPetition for certiorari was denied in Hicks v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:43 am by Liisa Speaker
The first In re Kanjia (Docket 320055) examined whether the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in Sanders applied to appeals from an order terminating parental rights and also whether Sanders applied retroactively to cases still pending when Sanders was decided. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:41 am by Ryan Scoville
This claim appears to rely on the Supreme Court’s anti-commandeering principle, which holds that Congress can’t oblige the fifty states to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program, or conscript state officers to enforce federal law. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:21 am by Anthony Zaller
The California Supreme Court also held that the reimbursement rate can be negotiated by parties as long as it fully reimburses the employee, and the amount does not have to be set at the IRS mileage rate. [read post]