Search for: "Bates v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2024, 1:18 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On Monday 21 October 2024, there was an application by the claimant in the case of Ibrahim v Kennedy KB-2023-002865. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 4:50 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Superior Court … Appeals Board En Banc Decisions Gonzalez (Guillermo) v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
She was the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (and the mother of current Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:04 am by Mark Savill
Barrister Justin Bates discussed the Rakusen v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am by Robin Stewart
Case preview: Rakusen v Jepson – Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) and superior landlords in the Court of Appeal Next month the Court of Appeal will hear an appeal from a landlord in a rent repayment order case, Rakusen v Jepson. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Mar. 11, 2020), the Appellate Division of the Yolo County Superior Court reversed an unlawful detainer judgment. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by INFORRM
In Buck v Morris et al., 2015 ONSC 5632 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action arising out of a “Statement from the Town of Aurora Counsel”. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Douglas, 2015 ONSC 1104 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded general damages of Can$30,000 to the individual plaintiff in respect of five postings on a bulletin board which were accessed 742 times. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  We await the reargued decision with bated breath – actually that’s not true; we’d be bluer than a Blue Dog Democrat if that were so. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
Lexis 1688, at *21), the court let a number of warning-related claims survive preemption under PLIVA v. [read post]