Search for: "CASTILLO v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2025, 11:30 am
Citing its own precedent in Castillo v. [read post]
13 Apr 2025, 5:39 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 7:56 am
” Castillo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 6:31 am
Castillo, 692 F.3d 108, 111 (2d Cir. 2012). [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 9:18 am
Subpoena laws vary slightly from state to state, so you must contact an experienced car accident lawyer if unsure of your state’s guidelines. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 9:54 am
Pringle v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 12:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:48 pm
Castillo, the defendant was charged with home invasion and child endangerment. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 3:20 pm
From today's decision in Flynn v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 3:25 am
JUST CLICK ON THE CASE NAMES BELOW… Federal Circuit Court Opinion of Related Interest United States of America v. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm
The issue in the appeal was whether a foreign state whose agents remotely install spyware on claimants in the UK, causing psychiatric injury to those being spied upon, is entitled to immunity from civil proceedings within the meaning of section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2024, 2:37 pm
Those decisions are: Graham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2024, 9:37 am
Those decisions are: Graham v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:33 am
See, e.g., Del Castillo v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:38 am
ShareThe justices will hear oral argument in Department of State v. [read post]
