Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2019, 8:05 pm
In 1992, a California Court of Appeals, in Winet v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 3:50 pm
Here’s the situation in California: In 1978, the California Supreme Court issued a decision called Mailand v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 1:44 pm
Additional Resources: California Trucking Association et al., v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
A price squeeze occurs when a vertically integrated company with a monopoly in the upstream market sets its wholesale prices to its customers so high that they cannot compete effectively with it at the downstream level. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:11 am
Employee v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
A recent California case, Ahdout v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am
Stathakos v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
On November 2, 2009, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in Schachter v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
On November 2, 2009, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in Schachter v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The plaintiffs in Matthew Edwards et al., v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 12:52 am
Freeman v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:03 am
On November 2, 2009, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion in Schachter v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The Facts in Pfizer In Pfizer, retail pharmacy plaintiffs alleged that pharmaceutical companies fixed pharmaceuticals prices, and asserted claims under California’s antitrust statute - the Cartwright Act (Bus. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm
California companies have been required to reconsider their use of independent contractors since the state’s Supreme Court outlined the new ABC test in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:59 pm
v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 1:33 pm
As we previously wrote here, AB5 codified and expanded the “ABC test” adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 1:21 pm
As we previously wrote here, AB5 codified and expanded the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
In Colman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:55 am
In its complaint, the OAG accused Bioelements of engaging in what it described as a “blatant price fixing scheme” when it entered into dozens of contracts called “Internet Only Accounts Agreements” with third party companies that required them to sell Bioelements’ products online for at least as much as the suggested retail price set by Bioelements in violation of California’s Cartwright Act (California’s general… [read post]
