Search for: "Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid" Results 1 - 20 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
S. 365 (1926), the right to compensation is triggered if they "physically appropriat[e]" property or otherwise interfere with the owner's right to exclude others from it, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
In Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm by Kalvis Golde
First, the landlords argued that the law’s restrictions on reclaiming rent-stabilized apartments from current tenants are an uncompensated physical taking of their property under the Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am by Ilya Somin
To put it in more legalistic terms, the Supreme Court has ruled in Cedar Point Nurseries v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:19 am by Carolyn Drell
However, even if courts find a taking occurred within a managed retreat plan—and the current Supreme Court has shown a certain vigilance when it comes to takings, if 2021’s majority opinion in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 12:45 pm by Ezra Rosser
Abstract below: In 2021, the Supreme Court decided Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Shelby D. Green
”1 In Professor Lee Anne Fennell’s view, there is perhaps no muddier area than the law of takings, and made even more so by Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:30 am by Larissa Katz
(P. 42.)2 His point of departure is a recent US Supreme Court case, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]