Search for: "Charles Rothfeld"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm
The first panel will focus on last term and the American Legion decision, featuring ADF’s David Cortman, Mayer Brown’s Charles Rothfeld and Jones Day’s Kaytlin Roholt, moderated by the New York Times’ Adam Liptak. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 8:56 am
Zinke, a major ICWA lawsuit under way in Texas; and Charles Rothfeld, who represented the birth father in the important ICWA case Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
The list of attorneys includes oral-argument veterans like Charles Rothfeld, Ian Gershengorn and Tom Goldstein, and well as newcomers to the oral argument circuit like Orrick’s Bob Loeb. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:01 am
Featured are three lawyers who have been involved in high-profile ICWA litigation, Timothy Sandefur of the Goldwater Institute, Matthew McGill of Gibson Dunn, and Charles Rothfeld of Mayer Brown and Yale Law School [details and registration; event not livestreamed, but video to be posted later] And now for something completely different: “Charles Evans Hughes and Chevron Deference” [Gerard Magliocca] Tags: administrative law, adoption, autos, Indian… [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Among the attorneys on this list are two of the most prolific Supreme Court attorneys presently in practice, Carter Phillips and Charles Rothfeld. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am
Charles Rothfeld is special counsel at Mayer Brown. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm
And if that’s the case, he asked attorney Charles Rothfeld, representing the drivers, why can’t states decide to impose a criminal penalty instead? [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
It has been almost ten years to the day since the Supreme Court’s last substantive attention to trademark law. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Today's featured defense victory is United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
If the Justices were worried that the government’s position would sweep too much conduct into the purview of Section 922(g), during the argument of Charles Rothfeld, representing respondent James Castleman, they seemed to have the opposite concern – that is, that Castleman’s position would result in conduct that Congress would have intended to fall under Section 922(g) being excluded. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am
Counsel for the petitioner Texas water district, Charles Rothfeld, is an alum of the SG’s office, as is Lisa Blatt, counsel for the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm
ROTHFELD: Absolutely not. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm
Thus, the Chief Justice expressed some astonishment that “one drop of blood” could “trigger[] all these rights” under ICWA; both he and Justice Alito also tried to test the limits of the position taken by Charles Rothfeld, representing the Father, by asking him about a scenario in which the Tribe would allow virtually anyone to join the Tribe, regardless of whether the would-be members had any actual Indian ancestry. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
Indeed, at one point in the argument Justice Alito asked Charles Rothfeld why, if the case might have come out the same way under South Carolina law even if ICWA did not apply, “are we here? [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:10 am
Briefly: SCOTUSblog’s online gene patenting symposium continues with posts by Charles Rothfeld on the practicalities of patenting a gene, and by Professor Robin Feldman on the “conversation . . . between the court and the Federal Circuit. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:50 am
Dan Burk – University of California, Irvine Law School Robert Cook-Deegan – Duke University Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy Robin Feldman – Hastings College of the Law Christopher Holman – UMKC School of Law Susan McBee and Bryan Jones – Baker Donelson Rob Merges – University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall Kevin Noonan – McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP Arti Rai – Duke University School of Law Charles… [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Nelson 2 Charles A. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:59 am
Representing the Capatos, Charles Rothfeld of Mayer Brown LLP argued that, when Congress said “child” in 1939, the unambiguous meaning was the “biological child of married parents” since over ninety-five percent of children were born in wedlock, a position that drew considerable questioning from the bench. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
(Eugene Volokh) The opinion is here; congratulations to my Mayer Brown LLP colleagues Stephen Shapiro, Timothy Bishop, Jeffrey Sarles, and Charles Rothfeld, and to Fish & Richardson’s Jonathan Singer, John Dragseth, and Deanna Reiche, all of whom represented the winning side, Mayo. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
. -- "Appellate lawyer of the week" profiles on lawyers arguing recent and upcoming cases including Harvey Schwartz, Cliff Sloan, Charles Rothfeld, Jose Garza and Dan Domenico. [read post]