Search for: "Corder v. Laws"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 2:23 pm
Ultimately, Justice Baxter writes an unpersuasive (at least in my mind) opinion that concludes that a remand is necessary because the multiple witnesses who testified that the decedent intended to divorce his wife and that the decedent "felt that his marriage was a mistake because his wife had continued to work as a prostitute despite her promises to stop" were insufficient as a matter of law to prove that divorce was likely. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 8:12 am
Corder v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:59 pm
Corder timely appealed. 08a0411n.06 2008/07/09 Bariteau v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm
Corder v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:56 am
Our lower courts have long held that, under § 3205(b), '[w]here the deceased effects the insurance upon her own life, it is well-established law that she can designate any beneficiary she desires without regard to relationship or consanguinity' (Corder v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 12:02 pm
Cir. 1994) (coding clerk under the Rehabilitation Act); Law v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:42 pm
The trial court found the Board erred by overturning Corder’s interpretation of the zoning ordinance, concluded the Board’s actions were “arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion and … not supported by the law or evidence,” and reversed the Board’s decision, and the Board appealed. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
 The issue in Corder v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:28 pm
Cir. 1994) (coding clerk under the Rehabilitation Act); Law v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
Video 3: Turner v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
Cal. 2007) (stating that Labor Code § 226.7 “provides for an additional hour of pay for each day that an employer fails to provide an employee a meal or rest period”); Corder v. [read post]
