Search for: "D. BRINKER"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Last week we filed a supplemental brief under Rule of Court 8.520(d)(1) to address the impact of Martinez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Meanwhile, on December 16, 2011, Brinker applied for leave to file a supplemental brief pursuant to Rule of Court 8.520(d) to bring a federal district judge's order to the Court's attention. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:49 pm
(followed by cocktails and hors d'ouevres from 5:00-6:00) at Le Meridien (Galleria) in Dallas. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:40 am
The parties’ supplemental briefing presented starkly different interpretations of Brinker’s implications as to predominance, with Judge Fitzgerald finding that, while “the Brinker court did not elaborate on every possible form of common proof that may satisfy a predominance assessment,” the plaintiff in Paige sufficiently “allege[d] the existence of various uniform policies that were consistently applied to purported class members,” and… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:54 am
Evansville, Indiana - Indiana copyright attorneys for Brinker Manufacturing Jewelers, Inc. d/b/a Brinker's Jewelers of Evansville, Indiana (Brinker's) and South Central Communications Corporation d/b/a South Central Digital of Nashville, Tennessee ("South Central Digital") filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging, inter alia, that Rogers Galleria Jewelers, LLC d/b/a The… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:49 pm
In Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:36 pm
I have spent the better part of the morning reviewing and digesting oral argument in Brinker. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:56 am
On May 25, 2012, Central District Judge Dean D. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:00 am
Brinker, at 24. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Recently, the workers filed a supplemental brief under Rule of Court 8.520(d) addressing Martinez v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:02 am
Posted by D. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:02 am
Posted by D. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:42 pm
No word yet on whether the argument will be broadcast over the internet, as Brinker was. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
D. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 1:37 pm
(Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:15 am
Plaintiffs agree that no one from Brinker supervised, trained or directed them; no Brinker employees were even present when Plaintiffs worked. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:36 am
I’d put the crowd in excess of 1000. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:09 pm
Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:45 am
Rylaarsdam, Associate Justice Richard D. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
On remand after Brinker, the Court of Appeal reaffirmed its earlier decision. [read post]
