Search for: "Davis v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2024, 1:00 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Stevie Martin, Strasbourg Observers: Dániel Karsai v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 29 October, Richard Spearman KC handed down judgment on a preliminary issue in the data protection claim of Joseph Pacini, Carsten Geyer -v- Dow Jones & Company Inc [2024] EWHC 2714 (KB). [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 12:59 am by Frank Cranmer
In answer to a written question from Julia Buckley (Shrewsbury, Lab) to the Secretary of State for Justice asking “when her Department plans to publish a response to the Law Commission report entitled Celebrating Marriage: A New Weddings Law, published in July 2022”, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Alex Davies-Jones, said this: “We are aware that the Law Commission made recommendations for wholesale change of weddings law in July 2022. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:43 am by Gene Takagi
Additional Resources for Context Brief of Professor Roger Colinvaux as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendants-Appellees and Affirmance: American Alliance for Equal Rights v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on the same day a statement in open court was read out in the case of Davies v BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
Sir David Davis MP has tabled a number of far reaching amendments [pdf] to the  Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill [pdf] which returns to the House of Commons for its Committee Stage on 8 May 2024. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 10 April 2024 there were hearings in the cases of Jones Nickolds ltd v Ian Robert Pearce KB-2024-000886 and Specialty Coffee Association Ltd v Elizabeth Odushola KB-2023-002556. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Newspaper Journalism and regulation IPSO Resolution Statement – 00019-24 Peach v dorset.live, 7 children in sex cases (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 14 Confidential sources (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 00032-24 Hudson v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 20825-23 Revell v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), No… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
” The regulator found that programmes presented by Jacob Rees-Mogg, Esther McVey and Philip Davies were news segments that which had no “exceptional justification. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: The Parish and the Privy Council. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Chiodo, Chantelle Cseh, Rebecca Jones, Jacob Damstra, John Adair), and a number of Ontario’s leading firms are represented, including Davies, Lenczner Slaght, Lerners, Torys LLP and Adair, Goldblatt Bieber LLP. [read post]