Search for: "Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2023, 1:20 am
The ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova v Russia on the legal recognition of same-sex couples. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 4:15 pm
Sex Offender Registry Board. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:28 am
If the offender does not use a weapon and the complainant is over 16 years old, there is no mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
14 May 2021, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
G involved Christopher’s Law (Sex Offender Registry), 2000, which established the Ontario sex registry, and the different treatment of persons found guilty of a sexual offence and those held to be not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (“NCRMD”). [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
From Thursday's Redmond v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:33 am
Feliz had “no prior record of a sex offense”; “no psychiatric diagnosis indicating a compulsion toward sexually deviant activity; no history of violations of probation or terms of pretrial release;” no exclusion zones entered into the GPS monitoring system; “no geographically proximate victim”; and had been classified by the Sex Offender Registry Board as a level one sex offender, meaning… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Gundy had been convicted of state sex offenses in Maryland that required his registration on the sex offender registry on October 3, 2005. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
Based on these allegations, the Court could reasonably conclude that Defendant created a portion of his websites’ content by adding the personal information of those Plaintiffs not listed on preexisting sex offender registries and misidentifying them as individuals who have been convicted of a sex-related offense. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
App’x 189 (10th Cir. 2009) (joined opinion) sex offender registry does not violate Commerce Clause United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
(relisted after the October 14 conference) Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:16 am
Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am
(apparently relisted after the October 14 conference) Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
California Franchise Tax Board, 15-1442 (addressing the Multistate Tax Compact); Haugen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
In an effort to make North Carolina “one of the toughest states, if not the toughest state” in the country in dealing with those on its sex-offender registry, North Carolina enacted N.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Cooper v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
”School boards can make accommodations for students whose gender identity does not correspond with their legal sex, but the accommodation cannot be simply allowing them to use the other bathroom. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:34 am
In a recent case, Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 380316 v. [read post]
