Search for: "Doe v. Department of Health and Welfare Termination of parental rights" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Major decision making with respect to the children’s health, education, and welfare would usually be made by the mother as the primary caregiving parent. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Brackeen, the Court upheld the Indian Child Welfare Act and I admit several of the justices did use origi [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
Under the Age 29 Law, a parent’s health insurance serves as the basis for coverage for an eligible adult child who has otherwise aged off of the parent’s policy.Appellate Division, Second DepartmentChild Support Order reversed where Support Magistrate erred in failing to advise the pro se mother that she had “an absolute right to be represented by counsel at the hearing at her own expense and that she was entitled to an adjournment to retain the… [read post]
Family member is defined as spouse or a child, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, domestic partner, or parent-in-law (and will shortly include a “designated person” per the amendment noted above). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
The father argued that the publication of the parents’ names would ‘inevitably’ be ‘catastrophic’ for the child and would potentially cause a termination of the parent-child relationship. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:18 am by Russell Knight
 2004) “[I]ncarceration, as a foreseeable result of criminal activity, does not ipso facto relieve one of the obligation to pay child support” Meyer v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm by Alexander Volberding
Generally, an employee does not need to take such leave if another suitable individual—such as a co-parent, co-guardian, or the usual child care provider—is available to provide the care the employee’s child needs. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 12:07 pm by Kate Fort
In the Brackeen case, foster and adoptive parents, and the states of Texas, Louisiana, and Indiana filed suit against the United States, United States Department of the Interior and its Secretary, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and its Director, BIA Principal Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Secretary seeking a declaration that Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) was unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust was heard on 7 June 2018. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (HHS) urging it to address “persistent” organ transplant discrimination against people with disabilities. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am by Rosalind English
 Department of Health [2017] UKSC 41, 14 June 2017 – judgment here; previous post here. [read post]