Search for: "Donnell v. Donnell" Results 1 - 20 of 789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm by Aaron Moss
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the Irish courts have acknowledged that the law protects reasonable expectations of privacy CRH plc v Competition and Consumer Protection Commission [2017] IESC 34 (29 May 2017) [32] (Charleton J)), albeit that it does so by means of a (constitutional) tort of invasion of privacy (the leading case is Kennedy v Ireland [1987] IR 587 (doc | pdf) (Hamilton P); on the juridical nature of such a claim, see now McGee v… [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
By Sophia Williams From 1933 to 1945, during the Nazi party’s rise to power, the Nazis looted, confiscated, or involuntarily transferred more than half a million artworks owned by Jewish art collectors and other victims.[1] Following Nazi party looting before and after World War II, thousands of artworks ended up in museum collections around the world, including in New York, and remain there today.[2] A recent act passed in August 2022 “to amend the education law, in relation to notice… [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Angel [sic] Kelley's order today in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 8:59 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Hawkins, 895 So.2d 1155, 1156 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); O’Donnell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Inspector Andy O’Donnell, from the Met’s professional standards directorate, apologised to her “for the distress that you have suffered”. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:43 pm by John Floyd
    Earlier this year, in January, the Public Policy Research Institute at Texas A&M University also reported on the results of the Harris County settlement in O’Donnell v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Emma Snell
In the 2013 report from the Justice Department inspector general, investigators said they did “not believe” Joseph V. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Emma Snell
  Attorney General Merrick Garland has threatened to sue states that have outlawed or restricted abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the exercise of constitutional rights “may be regulated by the Oireachtas when the common good requires this” (Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IR 294, 312 (HC; Kenny J) affd [1965] IR 294, 345, [1965] IESC 1 (3 July 1965) [23] (Ó Dálaigh CJ; Lavery, Kingsmill Moore, Haugh and Walsh JJ concurring); see, recently, Burke v Minister for Education [2022] IESC 1 (24 January 2022) [95] (O’Donnell… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  Cf Edward O’Donnell, “Are We Living in the Gilded Age 2.0? [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
John O’Donnell reports for Reuters. [read post]