Search for: "Edwards v. California"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:52 am
Our own Robert Milligan and Damon Anastasia published an oustanding article in the California Lawyer on the status of the law in California on non-competition agreements in light of Edwards v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:45 am
In Raymond Edwards II vs. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:31 pm
(Edwards v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
Over the last several years courts have been narrowing an employer's ability to restrict employee activities after termination, culminating with the California Supreme Court's decision in Edwards v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:03 am
California (recognizing right of self-representation). [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
Even though she taught for the entire year.So she's not entitled to employment for life even under California's (extraordinarily generous) tenure rules. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:39 pm
See Edwards v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 12:23 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm
The California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Edwards v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 9:27 pm
According to the California Supreme Court's website, the Court’s highly anticipated decision in Edwards v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:39 pm
” This summer, the California Supreme Court in Edwards v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 8:28 am
On February 3, 2015, Judge Edward Chen of California’s Northern District issued an order in Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
By Robert Milligan, Kurt Kappes and James McNairy The California Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision in Edwards v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 5:17 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In its 2008 landmark decision Edwards v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:47 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 1:53 pm
On August 30, 2006, the California Court of Appeals ruled in Edwards v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 5:57 pm
Code section 2802 may be released, as was held in Edwards v. [read post]
