Search for: "Feres v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2021, 6:17 am by Don Asher
 The ban was called the “Feres Doctrine,” referencing the Supreme Court of the United States decision in Feres v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, one of the cases that they considered at their private conference last week. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am by Florian Mueller
It needs to be taken into consideration that monetary compensation is the norm, not a rare exception, in the real world as far as the technology sector (from chipsets to cars) is concerned.In the United States, the fact that someone licensed a patent doesn't necessarily preclude the patent holder from being granted injunctive relief. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 12:13 pm by Joe Price
Government protecting it from all lawsuits on behalf of active military members as held by the United States Supreme   Court in the case Feres v United States, 1950. [read post]
27 May 2019, 2:19 pm by Patrick A. Malone
 Under the Feres doctrine, members of the United States armed forces are barred from making a claim against the United States for personal injury or death arising “incident to service. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
The prospect that President Trump might invoke the Insurrection Act in order to have authority either to bring state National Guard forces of federal armed forces into service in relation to the capture and removal of migrants inside the United States. [read post]