Search for: "Friedman v. City of Highland Park"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
City of Highland Park (2015), holding that the banned arms were not common at the time of ratification, had no militia nexus, and were not needed by citizens for self-defense. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 1:05 pm
City of Highland Park. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
See Friedman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:19 pm
Highland Park). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
City of Highland Park. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 7:52 am
One such community is the City of Highland Park, Illinois (“Highland”). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
City of Highland Park, 15-133, which originated from the Second (not Second Amendment) City, brought a constitutional challenge to a city ordinance banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Article 3 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights addresses the right to personal security. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:55 am
City of Highland Park, was the constitutionality of a 2013 ordinance. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:54 am
City of Highland Park [docket; cert. petition, PDF]. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
City of Highland Park, was the constitutionality of a 2013 ordinance. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:35 am
City of Highland Park, Illinois, No. 15-133. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
City of Highland Park, 15-133. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Friedman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
City of Highland Park, 15-133, grabs the newly vacant spot at the head of the table as this Second Amendment challenge to a city ordinance banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines picks up its fifth relist. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
City of Highland Park, 15-133. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
City of Highland Park, 15-133, stuck around for its third re-list. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
City of Highland Park 15-133Issue: (1) Whether the [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
