Search for: "Gould v. Gould" Results 1 - 20 of 954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2022, 11:30 am
Author Francis Carruthers Gould  Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Fancourt) Greencastle MM LLP v Payne and others [2022] EWHC 438  (13 Jan 2022)For many years witnesses in civil proceedings in England and Wales have delivered their evidence in chief in writing. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
Barnett of USC Gould School of Law—the eighth entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium—are developed in greater detail in “Regulatory Rents: An Agency-Cost Analysis of the FTC Rulemaking Initiative,” a chapter in the forthcoming book FTC’s Rulemaking Authority, which will be published by Concurrences later this year. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Guest Blogger This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Or progressives might employ what Tara Leigh Grove calls “flexible textualism” to insist that the state attend to the functional preconditions for the realization of enumerated rights, as when the plaintiffs in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 3:07 pm by Jon Sands
King, No. 21-10002 (1-25-22)(Gould w/Bennett & Nelson). [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by William B. Gould IV
Can you give us some background on the OSHA case that has gotten so much attention, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Gould v Jordan (No.2) [2021] FCA 1289 White J held that the impugned statements referred to the plaintiff and conveyed defamatory imputations but that they were made on an occasion of qualified privilege. [read post]