Search for: "Gould v. Gould" Results 1 - 20 of 978
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The University of Southern California [USC] Gould School of Law has created an "English Medieval Legal Documents Database, A Compilation of Published Sources from 600 to 1535" which it has posted on the Internet. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The University of Southern California [USC] Gould School of Law has created an "English Medieval Legal Documents Database, A Compilation of Published Sources from 600 to 1535" which it has posted on the Internet. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:21 pm by Jordan Schneider
v=rqDCieiDWAE Check out the newsletter at ChinaTalk.media! [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Whether petitioner intends to publish the information on a publicly available website is irrelevant to the applicability of the exemption since "access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 274 [1996]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 59 AD3d 353, 355 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Whether petitioner intends to publish the information on a publicly available website is irrelevant to the applicability of the exemption since "access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 274 [1996]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 59 AD3d 353, 355 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:29 am by Derek Muller
Judge Graber, joined by Judges Gould and Watford, in No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 8:25 am by Unknown
Depending on whether a lower court finding is moot, the petition added, it also may be necessary for the SEC to show that it would be infeasible to distribute any disgorgement award to harmed investors (Goulding v. [read post]