Search for: "Hayes v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm by Gina Gkoulgkountina
Supreme Court’s recent holding in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:12 am by Joseph L. Hyde
Hayes, 261 N.C. 648, 650 (1964) (defense counsel assigned by the prosecutor was not sufficient); State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 1:36 pm by Tobias Lutzi
The courses will be published by Brill in the series Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law / Recueil des cours de l’Académie de La Haye. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Before the discussion, Clare Cushman will introduce viewers to the Society’s newest publication, An Illustrated Guide to the Supreme Court.The Organization of American Historians is circulating the amicus brief it joined in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am by Norman L. Eisen
’” Op. at 14 (quoting, in part, the test in Nixon v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:59 am by jonathanturley
The Supreme Court has given the press added “breathing room” with the higher standard of proof found in cases such as New York Times v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
Myers (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Employment Agreement) Hayes v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  (It is difficult to disagree with liberal TV host Chris Hayes's assessment that Cruz is more interested in being a podcaster than a senator.)All of this is, of course, a matter of degree. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
Hayes defeated Samuel Tilden by one electoral vote (but lost the popular vote) in the 1876 election, aggrieved Democrats agreed not to contest the outcome if Hayes would withdraw all remaining federal forces from former Confederate states, ending Reconstruction. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Johnson J dismissed the appeal in the case of Hayes v Liberal Democrats and Dudhill [2023] EWHC 3166 (KB). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]