Search for: "IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUC." Results 1 - 20 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Mihir Rai
Biden advocated significant regulatory changes to the Supreme Court, proposing 18-year term limits for justices and a mandatory code of ethics. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Simon LazarusAs few question, the Supreme Court majority’s end-of-term presidential immunity head-scratcher, Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm by Michael Lowe
”  This was expanded by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) to mandate that anyone who cannot afford to pay for an attorney has a constitutional right to have counsel provided to them at the government’s expense. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am by H. Juanita Beecher, FortneyScott
‘Stop WOKE’ Act Ban on DEI Training Violates First Amendment The 11th Circuit—in In re: Amendments to Rules Regul., the Florida Bar-Continuing Legal Educ. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am by H. Juanita Beecher, FortneyScott
‘Stop WOKE’ Act Ban on DEI Training Violates First Amendment The 11th Circuit—in In re: Amendments to Rules Regul., the Florida Bar-Continuing Legal Educ. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Holmes, our supreme court noted that a family court judge can award retroactive child support. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
Holmes, our supreme court noted that a family court judge can award retroactive child support. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:40 am by privacylawyer
The first is that it gives the government the power to dictate potentially huge changes or mandatory elements of an online service. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While it all meant business as usual for the Taft Court, pesky progressive academics were flexing their muscles in the law reviews during the 1920s by yammering about legal indeterminacy and realism in law; doting on dissents; railing about the Court’s conservatism; becoming a claque for Holmes, Brandeis, and Stone; and, according to some, undercutting respect for the rule of law and the Court’s authority. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
The Supreme Court has refused leave to appeal. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Clearly, traditional notions of the family must be re-examined in the search for rational and equitable social and legal policies. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
We at the Supreme Court mourn the loss of a beloved colleague, a fiercely independent defender of the rule of law, and an eloquent advocate for civics education. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]