Search for: "In Re Securities and Exchange Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 2,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2022, 12:15 pm by Mark Astarita
The Securities and Exchange Commission today re-proposed rule amendments that would narrow the exemption from Section 15(b)(8) of the Securities Exchange Act, which requires any broker or dealer registered with the Commission to become a member of a…Read the Full Press ReleaseHave a securities law question? [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Ernest Badway
On February 9, 2021, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission refused to let a former investment adviser re-register, claiming that the barred adviser had not demonstrated “extraordinary circumstances” to merit re-entry . [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:53 am by Silver Law Group
The post Securities And Exchange Commission Charges Par Funding, United Fidelis Group And Others In Half-Billion Dollar Fraud Scheme appeared first on Securities Arbitration Lawyers Blog. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:04 am
Securities Litigation, a putative securities fraud class action lawsuit, brought under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 7:52 am by Silver Law Group
Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase Global Inc. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:15 am
We are examining the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the governance process. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:29 pm
Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission Enforcement Division took the unusual step of re-opening an investigation of financial reporting irregularities at Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) after dropping a previous investigation just fifteen months earlier in June 2008. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:51 am by Matthew Landis
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules that will assist certain small businesses and startups in fundraising efforts by creating an updated exemption from registration for certain small issuers of securities. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 3:15 am by Liz Dunshee
Also on Friday, the Commission issued this 4-page release to reopen the comment period on proposed Exchange Act Rule 10c-1. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 10:07 am by Jon Shazar - Dealbreaker
We’re sure there’s no ideological axe to grind with the Securities and Exchange Commission here. [read post]