Search for: "In Re Standard Commercial Tobacco Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2025, 3:15 am
As I said yesterday, this case should be of interest even if you're not interested in adult entertainment (indeed, even if you're hostile to adult entertainment). [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 9:49 am
While we’re here, I’ll recommend Bill MacLeod’s considerably more recent discussion here. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
PMI Sorbet PMI v BAT [2023] EWHC 2616 related to ‘heat not burn’ tobacco devices. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
It is a debate that mirrors such exposures as asbestos, tobacco, opioid use, and artificial sweeteners. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 3:50 am
Baumeister and his co-authors echo a similar sentiment: “Happiness seems intertwined with the benefits one receives from others. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
All of this ensures that they can each develop independently, and in an appropriate fashion (for more on all of this, see my paper “A Little Parthenon No Longer: The Proportionality of Tobacco Packaging Restrictions on Autonomous Communication, Political Expression and Commercial Speech” (2018) 69(2) Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 175-211 (SSRN)). [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:07 pm
***WARNING: This article contains some strong language*** On 27 April 2022, the UK’s advertising watchdog, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), banned an outdoor poster which promoted an estate agent, trading as Lamb & Co. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm
Cir. 1983); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
ShareThere is no man in this country to whom the colored race is more indebted. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:44 am
" In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1690 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
The public vaccination program was a national strategy developed to address this threat, and these were core policy decisions as defined by the Supreme Court of Canada in Imperial Tobacco. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
.; In re, 19 CBN 870 (Bankr. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
See, e.g., In re Brown Jordan Co., 219 USPQ 375 (TTAB 1983) (holding that stamping the mark after purchase of the goods, on a tag attached to the goods that are later transported in commerce, is sufficient use). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
But here, the UCL and FAL claims are based on standards set forth in an approved state plan, and which therefore preempt any federal standards. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
But here, the UCL and FAL claims are based on standards set forth in an approved state plan, and which therefore preempt any federal standards. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:21 pm
In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The course begins with issues of definitions and of variations in approaches to legal and other governance mechanisms in the U.S. and among major commercial jurisdictions. [read post]
