Search for: "In re Seale"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
Now we’re really getting somewhere. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:42 pm
SEALS Call for Papers Law Professors - The Southeastern Association of Law Schools (SEALS) has a call for papers - CALL FOR PAPERS A roundtable discussion will be held at SEALS 2010 on "Re-evaluating Corporate Criminal Liability. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 11:00 am
Law Professors - The Southeastern Association of Law Schools (SEALS) has a call for papers - CALL FOR PAPERS A roundtable discussion will be held at SEALS 2010 on "Re-evaluating Corporate Criminal Liability. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:18 pm
Keep in mind that we’re NOT talking about the sealing or expunging of a criminal record. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm
The Washington Times‘ web site has this editorial, dated tomorrow, headlined, “Save the SEALs” and sub-headed, “You’re for the SEALs, or you’re for the terrorists. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:19 pm
Thanks to a tip from Kestrel at Tipping Point I’ve learned that grey seals and common seals are slaughtered in Scotland with as much brutality as they’re slaughtered in Canada. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:03 pm
If you’re shopping online for healthcare products and you see a seal stating that the product is “Doctor Trusted,” chances are you feel better about buying it because it’s been evaluated by a team of independent doctors. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:34 am
"The federal bankruptcy court judge overseeing the saga of troubled film executive David Bergstein has re-sealed an explosive report by a court-appointed trustee about Bergstein’s financial dealings that was made public on Monday—but not before the report, obtained by The... [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:04 am
From the Canadian Press: Blame the seal hunt if you find out you're wearing Fluffy or Rover. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:54 pm
If you’d asked us two weeks ago what next big foe Navy SEAL Team Six would face, we’re pretty sure we wouldn’t have answered “Disney”, but apparently when it comes to trademarks, anyone is fair game. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 7:10 pm
Res. 977 was introduced by Rep. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:04 am
Understanding Eligibility Criteria For Sealing Criminal Records In Colorado Not all criminal records in Colorado are eligible for sealing. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:44 am
Governor Wolf recently signed into law House Bill 1419, also known as the Clean Slate Act, which automatically seals the record of certain offenses if the individual does not re-offend for ten years following a conviction. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 11:54 am
Please let Jeff Hirsch (jmhirsch@email.unc.edu) know if you’re interested... [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:10 pm
If you commit another criminal offense, these cases may be re-opened and used against you in court. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 1:38 pm
But it's a reminder that, if you're filing something sealed, you should be very careful, and you should likely check to make sure that the material did indeed get properly filed sealed, and be ready to call the clerk's office right away in case it wasn't. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
What I found was that (1) the seals aren't always there; (2) even if they were, you can remove the cartridge without visible evidence of tampering with the seal and (3) you can remove the circuit-board cover without even disturbing the plastic-strap seal; (4) even if that hadn't been true, the seal-inspection records are quite lackadaisical and incomplete; and (5) even if that weren't true, since the counties tend to re-use the same serial… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
If you’re dealing with an appeal and the trial court had sealed the record, check out Appeals and Writs in Criminal Cases, chap 8 and California Civil Writ Practice, chap 20. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:09 am
"Hunters couldn't go out last week because of storms, but they're hoping to go out onto the ice tomorrow," an official told AFP. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
The above one sentence denial order is unlawful, because, if you’re going to deny a seal, the law requires an explanation. [read post]
