Search for: "Jason Mazzone" Results 1 - 20 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2020, 11:39 am by Sandy Levinson
I confess myself quite mystified by the argument underlying Jason Mazzone's posting earlier today. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:14 am by Rick Hasen
Jason Mazzone at Balikinization, raising exactly a point I’d been pondering: namudno (verb): to persuade one’s colleagues (esp. on a court) to sign onto an opinion with broader implications than they perceive and then accuse them of backtracking when they later … Continue reading → [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:30 pm by Howard Bashman
Also at that blog, Jason Mazzone has a related post titled “Bostock: Were the liberal justices namudnoed? [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:47 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Over at Justia, Vikram Amar and Jason Mazzone make the case that there was not constitutional violation justifying federal court intervention. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm by Derek T. Muller
The Court may be "nonchalant," but, I think, this doctrine in particular is unusually weak as a vehicle for protecting "voting rights" under the Constitution.It’s also consistent with the views of Dean Vik Amar and Professor Jason Mazzone looking at this very case. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:47 am by Richard Pildes
At Verdict, Dean Vik Amar and Professor Jason Mazzone have a piece which focuses not on what the right federal-court remedy in the Wisconsin litigation was, but whether there was any substantive federal constitutional violation in the first place. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Some commentators have floated that idea that it would be permissible and advisable for the Senate sitting in the matter of President Trump’s impeachment to adopt a rule of private (that is, unreported to the public) voting on the question of whether the President ought to be convicted of the articles of impeachment adopted by the House. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Parts One and Two of this series, we introduced an important pending federal court challenge to Mississippi’s gubernatorial election regime, situated the dispute in constitutional context, and examined various procedural aspects of the case. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
As we explained in a column a few weeks ago, Part One in a series, an important federal lawsuit challenging Mississippi’s scheme for electing governors is wending its way through the federal courts. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Jason: Vik, as you know, last month three Virginia couples sued their state in federal court challenging a law requiring them to identify and report their race on the state’s marriage license application form. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
From the Right and from the Left, legislatures are considering—and in many cases enacting—laws that have no meaningful chance of surviving judicial challenge under the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In our two previous columns on the recent lawsuit by a Texas-based nonprofit organization—Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences (FASORP)—against Harvard Law Review (HLR) for its use of race and gender in selecting its members and authors for publication, we explored challenges the plaintiff faces in establishing standing to sue in federal court, the relationship of Title VI and IX (the statutory provisions the plaintiff has invoked) to the constitutional… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In our last column, we explored some threshold justiciability issues (focusing on the plaintiff’s standing to sue in federal court) in the recent federal lawsuit by a Texas-based nonprofit organization—Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences (FASORP)—against Harvard Law Review (HLR), challenging HLR’s use of race and gender in selecting members and also in selecting authors for publication. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
For many law students, membership in and service on an academic journal is a highlight of the law school experience. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
This three-part series looks at intriguing constitutional questions raised by California’s statutory enactment of SB 826, which requires publicly held corporations with principal executive offices located in California to have a prescribed number of women on their boards of directors. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 11:53 am by Jason Mazzone
  * * *Scholars interested in presenting a paper at the conference should first e-mail a title and summary of the proposed paper along with a CV to Professor Jason Mazzone at mazzonej[@]illinois.edu. [read post]