Search for: "Jeremy Hart"
Results 1 - 20
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 4:10 am
In framing the province of jurisprudence in this way Hart not only depart from the work of Thomas Hobbes and Jeremy Bentham, whose political commitments are well-known, but also from the seemingly much closer enterprise of John Austin. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Session 3C: JEREMY WALDRON (NYU Law School):"Positivism and Legality: Hart's Shifty Response to Fuller" [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:57 am
Hart took this opportunity to enunciate the kernel of his emerging theory of legal positivism, staking out his claim to be the 20th Century successor to Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
Hart Memorial Lecture, 25 de mayo de 2023. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:38 am
Kellogg cited the influence of H.L.A Hart and Learned Hand as evidence that jurisprudence is not only an academic concern, it has an impact on the practice of law. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:38 am
Kellogg cited the influence of H.L.A Hart and Learned Hand as evidence that jurisprudence is not only an academic concern, it has an impact on the practice of law. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 11:47 am
Jeremy Levitt (Florida International Univ. - Law) has published Africa: Mapping New Boundaries in International Law (Hart Publishing 2008). [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
This volume includes essays by Nicola Lacey, Jeremy Waldron, Leslie Green, Philip Pettit, Richard McAdams, and others. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:51 pm
Jeremy Waldron (New York University - School of Law) has posted Who Needs Rules of Recognition? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:45 am
Hart’s writings. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
Hart and Lon Fuller in their 1958 debate, need not displace the analytic/descriptive project of conceptual analysis of the concept of law, but, given its provenance going back at least as far as Jeremy Bentham, nor should it be dismissed from what John Austin labeled “the province of jurisprudence. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
Hart and Lon Fuller in their 1958 debate, need not displace the analytic/descriptive project of conceptual analysis of the concept of law, but, given its provenance going back at least as far as Jeremy Bentham, nor should it be dismissed from what John Austin labeled “the province of jurisprudence. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:50 am
This lack of clarity and candor was regrettable, Hart argued, both intrinsically, and because it hindered effective evaluation of the law, thereby obscuring questions as to whether the law should be respected or reviled, renewed, revised, or rejected.DAVID DYZENHAUS (University of Toronto Law) "The Grudge Informer Revisited"For Hart, the only way to avoid talking "stark nonsense"16 is to adopt the view of his positivist predecessors, Jeremy Bentham and… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:45 pm
When we mix this with some of the doubts about Hart’s “internal point of view” expressed by Jeremy Waldron(**) and others, we might well start to wonder if Hart’s victory over Austin is as complete as has been suggested. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:00 pm
posted by Jeremy Leaming The nation lost a passionate liberal, proud populist and decorated war hero on Sunday when U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:00 am
Kyritsis (eds), The Methodology of Constitutional Theory (Hart Publishing, 2022)) on SSRN. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 11:18 am
Baker & Jeremy Horder, eds., The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: The Legacy of Glanville Williams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:10 pm
Hart’s brand of legal positivism. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:00 am
R v Bembridge (1783)Jeremy Horder6. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
R v Bembridge (1783)Jeremy Horder6. [read post]
