Search for: "Lawrence B. Ebert"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
In response to my previous posts on patent application allowance rates, reader Lawrence B. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
In response to my previous posts on patent application allowance rates, reader Lawrence B. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:22 am
See Lawrence B. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:36 pm
From patent lawyer Lawrence B. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 2:25 am
EbertApril 22, 2007Posted by: Lawrence B. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:49 am
See for example Lawrence B. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:14 am
Comments to a 17 March 2008 post on californiastemcellreport included: Lawrence B. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:55 am
From patent lawyer Lawrence B. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:33 pm
Knight" happens to be a party in a famous Supreme Court case (156 U.S. 1 (1895)) Merely "looking backward," one notes Title: Deciding Cases the Old Fashioned Way Author: Lawrence B. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Most Senators never even knew that their vote on appropriations also included major changes in U.S. patent law.IPBiz thinks the current patent reform efforts started in 2005.Lawrence B. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm
Watch how this US patent lawyer, Lawrence B. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:36 pm
See also Carbon,Volume 33, Issue 7, Pages 1007-1010 (1995) LBE would agree with: I support the comment of Lawrence B. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:26 pm
.: IPBiz notes that it is not totally clear whether the 44% relates to fiscal 2007 [as does the 362,000 number] or for some other time period. ]Note: Lawrence B. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:08 am
B. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 1:34 am
[Lincoln] had reservations as to where certain patents were reaching.LBE has an article in the December 2006 issue of JPTOS, which gets into certain Civil War patents: Lawrence B. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:14 am
Ebert, "Patent Reform 2005: Sound and Fury Signifying What? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:14 am
TODAY, Sept. 2004, at 34, 34–37 (discussing the history of the transistor), and Lawrence B. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 11:44 am
Denmead,56 U.S. 330 (1854); Taney was on the opposite side) and Curtis' brother was a patent lawyer.See for example, Lawrence B. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:16 am
Although Taney applied a "what was the status (of African Americans) at the time of the signing of the Constitution" to infer "not citizens then or now", Curtis pointed out, as a factual matter, this simply was not true.ANDsee also, Lawrence B. [read post]
