Search for: "Lazar v Lazar"
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 8:54 am
District Court for the Northern District of California in its ruling in the Epic v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:30 pm
It was in response to the Supreme Court decision Kelo v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:04 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Epic v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm
The Lazar Case Lazar v Mor, decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley, involved facts somewhat similar to those in Meregalli. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
(I’m here; my Manne is here, and here with Lazar Radic; former FTC General Counsel Alden Abbott says that the FTC’s complaint is “Perhaps the Greatest Affront to Consumer and Producer Welfare in Antitrust History” here). [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia stressed in Verizon v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 10:05 am
The interdependence of Brussels I bis Regulation and Rome II Regulation It is true that in the interpretation of Article 4(1) Regulation 864/2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, the CJEU ruled that, damages connected with the death of a person due to such an accident within the Member State of the trial court, suffered by the victim’s relatives residing in another Member State, must be characterized as “indirect results” of the said accident, under the… [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 4:46 am
In Lazar v Mor, decided last week by the Appellate Division, First Department, three LLCs in 2012 acquired several residential properties in Manhattan. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Jodi Lazare & Kelsey Warr, A Gender-Based Approach to Historical Child Support: Comment on Colucci v Colucci. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
HLS’s Dehlia Umunna discusses Powell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
Humphrey’s article “Let’s Talk About Sex”: Legislating and Educating on the Affirmative Consent Standard is cited in the following article: Ruthy Lowenstein Lazar, Epistemic Twilight Zone of Consent, 30 S. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:30 am
Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:43 am
” Stroitelstvo Bulgaria Ltd. v. [read post]