Search for: "Lightfoot v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
Mary Parrish McCracken is an associate with Lightfoot. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
State Department, the group will be based largely in Poland and bring together multinational experts, including war crimes prosecutors and forensic specialists. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:48 pm by ernst
Lightfoot (1960) (racial gerrymandering); The New York Times v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am by Rachel Brown, Coleman Saunders
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot stated that the officers who refused to identify themselves “forfeited the right to be Chicago police officers,” although she would not have the final say about whether to discipline the officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:39 am by Jack Sharman
Or, as my Lightfoot colleagues Brandon Essig, Jeff Doss and I put it in a recent article for Law 360: With the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Disagreeing with the district court’s conclusion that Pierce was no longer good law in light of its subsequent decision in Lightfoot v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Prawfsblawg, Richard Re discusses the court’s recent decision in Lightfoot v. [read post]