Search for: "MATTER OF E K D K" Results 1 - 20 of 1,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm by David Kopel
[Lower Courts evading the "plain text" of the Second Amendment] The U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
What is ESG-Related D&O Risk Going to Look Like Going Forward? [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Wasserman, which annexes his report offered on the prior motion (NYSCEF Doc No. 359, Wasserman aff), and Wasserman opines therein that defendants’ conduct fell below the standard of care in the underlying action in that, among other things: (1) defendants failed to investigate and marshal appropriate lay and expert evidence in a timely fashion; (2) defendants stipulated to the fact that the Reem entities were alter egos, notwithstanding the fact that Stein testified to the contrary; (3)… [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:22 pm
In its remote pages it is written that the animals are divided into: a. belonging to the Em peror; b. embalmed; c. trained; d. pigs; e. sirens; f. fabulous; g. stray dogs; h. included in this classification, i. trembling like crazy; j. innumerable; k. drawn with a very fine camelhair; brush, l. et ceter; m. just broke the vase; n. from a distance look like flies.* * * La imposibilidad de penetrar el esquema divino del universo no puede, sin embargo, disuadirnos de planear… [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:51 am by admin
Her failure to update the meta-analysis made her report incomplete and inadmissible for a court matter in 2024. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
There is no male equivalent, no matter how many cats nor how few children a man has. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]