Search for: "Marc DeGirolami"
Results 1 - 20
of 132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2021, 6:42 am
In our new Legal Spirits podcast, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I explore the religious imagery at the Biden inauguration and reflect on what it suggests about contemporary American politics, particularly about the rise of what some commentators call the "Religious Left. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
Marc O. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 7:32 am
From SSRN:Jake Young, Qualified Immunity and Religious Liberty (December 10, 2020).Marc O. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 7:37 am
Marc DeGirolami has posted to SSRN Reconstructing Malice in the Law of Punitive Damages. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 7:20 am
" In our latest Legal Spirits podcast, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I discuss the Court's most decision in the Brooklyn litigation and its implications for similar cases and for our culture wars generally. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:07 pm
As my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I explain in a new Legal Spirits podcast, last week's argument was a bit perplexing. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
In a recent episode of our Legal Spirits podcast series, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I interview Duke classicist Jed Atkins about Christians in late Rome (Augustine and Tertullian, for example) and their thoughts on religious tolerance. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
In a recent episode of our Legal Spirits podcast series, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I interview Duke classicist Jed Atkins about Christians in late Rome (Augustine and Tertullian, for example) and their thoughts on religious tolerance. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
And, as my colleague Marc DeGirolami has explained, her writings about stare decisis—the idea that judges should stick to decided cases and not overrule them, even if judges think those cases are wrong—are well within the American legal tradition. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:47 pm
John's this year, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I recorded a Legal Spirits podcast on the 1966 film, "A Man for All Seasons. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 10:22 am
“Integrating Originalism and Stare Decisis”: Marc O. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:58 am
Again, at a superficial level, Jesus is offering a distinction between the two in His answer; but His answer only makes sense, I think, in that he converts the either/or into a both/and.Third, the opinion uses the phrase by defaulting to, as Professor Marc DeGirolami says, “plenipotentiary powers” of the state, then asking whether Christians are exempt from those powers. [read post]
2 May 2020, 9:50 pm
Marc DeGirolami provides the Catholic perspective at Mirror of Justice: Consider religious observance. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:57 am
John's Center for Law and Religion, Marc DeGirolami. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm
For those who are interested, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I have recorded a new episode for our Legal Spirits podcast series on last month's oral argument in the Blaine Amendments case, Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:55 am
” Law professor Marc O. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
DeGirolami, First Amendment Traditionalism, (Washington University Law Review, Forthcoming). [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:44 am
“Notes on a New Fusionism”: Marc DeGirolami has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 2:58 am
., federal judge rules Savannah violated First Amendment when it passed law forbidding unlicensed tour guides [Andrew Wimer, Institute for Justice] Pursuing a leak, San Francisco cops raid home of freelance journalist Bryan Carmody, hold him captive, seize his equipment [Yashar Ali, CNN] “SF police got warrant to tap journalist’s phone months before controversial raid” [Evan Sernoffsky, San Francisco Chronicle] Breadth of the Julian Assange indictment and implications for the… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
Arlene's Flowers, (Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 500 (March 2019)).Marc O. [read post]
