Search for: "Martin v. Ohio" Results 1 - 20 of 429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2024, 6:31 pm
 Pix Credit here I am delighted to circulate a rough discussion draft I have prepared in anticipation of its first presentation at a conference organized by the remarkable Martin Belov, Professor in Constitutional and Comparative Constitutional Law at the University of Sofia ‘St. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 2:58 pm by Commentary:
In the Spring of 2023, the 6th Circuit, which is the federal appellate court with jurisdiction for Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee, issued an unprecedented opinion in Martin v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
A federal district court agreed with the plaintiffs and cited another Ninth Circuit case, Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
Feb. 24, 2010) (quoting from Rule 26 report of Martin T. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Her dissertation title is, however, as Martin Short would say, a bit of a tell. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Christopher Kurka allowed Pat Martin, head of Alaska Right to Life, to use their offices for several hours when Martin traveled from Wasilla to the state Capitol “with the stated intent to distribute signed petitions to the Legislature. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm by Amy Howe
Lockheed Martin, involving whether a foreign government’s purchase of military equipment from a U.S. supplier is “commercial activity” for which they can be sued in U.S. courts Dermody v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Cartoonist Martin Rowson apologized for the “carelessness and thoughtlessness” of the depiction and the newspaper removed the cartoon from its website, explaining that it did not meet its editorial standards. [read post]