Search for: "Martin v. Fresh Express Incorporated "
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
Under the prevailing approach in the US, where YouTube is incorporated, the video would likely be considered a satire, because the copyright work, in this case the original RTS recording, is “a vehicle to poke fun at another target” (as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit put it in Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997), here). [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:30 am
The speculators in Fletcher v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
