Search for: "Miller v. Sparks"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am
Moldovan MPs have passed a ban on Russian war symbols, including the letters Z and V and the St George ribbon. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
Miller approved the guard mobilization at 3:04 p.m. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:05 pm
Miller, 982 F.3d 412 (6th Cir. 2020); States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:40 am
The Monterey Plus EIR sparked three new lawsuits. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Wright [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm
" Chance Miller of 9to5Mac also reported on Apple's release of a public beta. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
Internet and Social Media Indian police have registered a case against Twitter and prominent journalists for allegedly trying to spark communal tensions. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:19 pm
Today, in Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 3:43 am
Here is the opinion in Miller v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Creative spark is required, but there is no additional threshold of capacity. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm
This was perhaps best exemplified by the rendering of the verdict in R v Theriault, 2020 ONSC 5725 [Theriault], in June, in which over 20,000 people watched the verdict being read to hear whether the Theriault brothers, two off-duty police officers who pursued and injured Dafonte Miller, a Black teen, would be convicted of assault. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:47 pm
Santa Clara Valley Water District v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
*Mary Ziegler is the Stearns Weaver Miller Professor at Florida State University College of Law and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:47 am
Surescripts and U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
The decision in R (Miller) v (1) The College of Policing, and (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2020] EWHC 225 (Admin) tackles police recording, retention and dissemination of information about individuals in relation to “non-crime” hate incidents. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:02 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
This sparked speculation on whether the state would apply for adequacy under the GDPR. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
In 1981, in Rostker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 10:38 pm
In G.A.Q.L v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 11:18 am
Miller contends that the act of putting an affiant to an election is the suppression of evidence for which his client is entitled to punitive damages. [read post]
