Search for: "Mott v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2024, 8:18 am by David Urban
Mott in 1976 held squarely that agency use of resources to support one side in an election (in that case to support passage of a bond measure) violates state law. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
Mott, that the President had broad discretion in determining when to use these statutes in calling forth the militia, and that his determination was not subject to judicial review. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In the trademark case of Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that  “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Carrie Mott and Daniel Cockayne suggest that academics should adopt conscientious citation practices and acknowledge that citations directly impact the cultivation of diverse information. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm by fjhinojosa
Mott—An Old Gray Mare—Reexamined Through Its Own History, 82 La. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:20 pm by David Urban
Mott in 1976, held squarely that agency use of resources to support one side in an election (in that case to support passage of a bond measure) violates state law. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:42 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Secondly, MAC is often expressly stated as an event of default which allows the lessor to call a default and potentially terminate the lease and repossess the aircraft albeit commercially these rights appear to be theoretical in the current circumstances. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Hopkins, for Defendant-Appellee.David Andrew Rogers, for Plaintiff-Appellant.Richard Dwayne Danner, for Defendant-Appellee.Nathan Templeton Anderson, for Defendant-Appellee.Thomas Mott Hanson, for Defendant-Appellee.William D. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 10:35 am by Public Employment Law Press
(Mott, J.) 11/28/17, n.o.r.; Appeal of Johnson, 46 id. 67, Decision No. 15,443; Appeal of O.W., 43 id. 150, Decision No. 14,949). [read post]