Search for: "Ohio v. Robinette"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
Robinette, 1997-Ohio-343, (Robinette III)( the interpretation of Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourth Amendment should be harmonized unless there are persuasive reasons to find otherwise.) [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
” Justice O’Donnell, to the prosecutor On March 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm
Ohio, 392 US 1; 88 S Ct 1868 (1968); People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Ohio first joined this movement in 1993 in Arnold v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
’ State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:47 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
Robinette , 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 1997-Ohio-343 (1997) (Robinette III) ( “Case law indicates that, consistent with Robinette II, we should harmonize our interpretation of Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution with the Fourth Amendment, unless there are persuasive reasons to find otherwise. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
On March 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
On February 3, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Robinette, 1997-Ohio-343, (Robinette III) the Supreme Court of Ohio chose the latter course, but held that under federal law, the search in the case was not consensual. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
On February 3, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
On November 4, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001) (quoting Ohio v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 3:57 am
State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:40 am
Robinette, 80 Ohio St.3d 234, 1997-Ohio-343, 685 N.E.2d 762, that, after the purposes of a traffic stop have been completed, an officer may not ask the driver for permission to search his vehicle. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am
Ohio v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:02 am
(0) Watch what you tell your hairdresser, cont’d (5) Update: rude doctor won’t be punished, plans suit (5) Update: McLeod v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 9:23 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
Our analysis in this case is similar to that of the Ohio Supreme Court when it addressed the consent issue on remand from the United States Supreme Court in Robinette III. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:02 pm
(see, e.g., Robinette v. [read post]
