Search for: "People v. Farley"
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm
Over at the Lawyers, Guns, and Money blog, Robert Farley has an interesting post taking me to task for ignoring the siege of Harfleur in my discussion of Henry V and the law of armed conflict. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Case citation: Farley v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
People v Branch, 46 NY2d 645, 650 [1979]; People v Rentz, 67 NY2d 829, 831 [1986]). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Thanks to Christine Haight Farley for organizing! [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Renna v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:16 am
I haven't seen Iron Man 2, but Robert Farley and Davida H. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:39 pm
I have two people to thank for independently solving my Provenance Puzzle #2: my friend the San Antonio tax attorney and bibliophile Farley Katz, and Christopher Frey of Antiquariat Inlibris Gilhofer in Vienna. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:39 pm
I have two people to thank for independently solving my Provenance Puzzle #2: my friend the San Antonio tax attorney and bibliophile Farley Katz, and Christopher Frey of Antiquariat Inlibris Gilhofer in Vienna. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
Lee v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
It is clear after Matal v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
A public Facebook page is able to be viewed worldwide by whoever clicks on that page and the grapevine effect stemming from the use of this type of medium must be considered: Mickle v Farley [2013] NSWDC 295. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
” = = = The case cites recent work by Professors Farley & McKenna with regard to some confusion created by Belmora LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:05 am
During oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
[As Christine Farley pointed out in comments, that was against a different background legal regime. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 1:24 pm
Farley (N.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
(See the briefs and amicus briefs filed in the Jack Daniel’s case, and Part I of my paper with Professor Farley.) [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
Farley: what is the worst case scenario? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Farley: they do reject all SHIT marks.Rettew: Madonna for wines was once considered scandalous. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am
A far cry from Sears v. [read post]