Search for: "People v. Farley" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Over at the Lawyers, Guns, and Money blog, Robert Farley has an interesting post taking me to task for ignoring the siege of Harfleur in my discussion of Henry V and the law of armed conflict. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thanks to Christine Haight Farley for organizing! [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:39 pm by Mike Widener
I have two people to thank for independently solving my Provenance Puzzle #2: my friend the San Antonio tax attorney and bibliophile Farley Katz, and Christopher Frey of Antiquariat Inlibris Gilhofer in Vienna. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:39 pm by MikeW
I have two people to thank for independently solving my Provenance Puzzle #2: my friend the San Antonio tax attorney and bibliophile Farley Katz, and Christopher Frey of Antiquariat Inlibris Gilhofer in Vienna. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
A public Facebook page is able to be viewed worldwide by whoever clicks on that page and the grapevine effect stemming from the use of this type of medium must be considered: Mickle v Farley [2013] NSWDC 295. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
” = = = The case cites recent work by Professors Farley & McKenna with regard to some confusion created by Belmora LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 [As Christine Farley pointed out in comments, that was against a different background legal regime. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
(See the briefs and amicus briefs filed in the Jack Daniel’s case, and Part I of my paper with Professor Farley.) [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Farley: what is the worst case scenario? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Farley: they do reject all SHIT marks.Rettew: Madonna for wines was once considered scandalous. [read post]