Search for: "People v. Strickland" Results 1 - 20 of 200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm by A
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The majority held that despite the language in the New York Court of Appeals decision,People v Benevento (91 N.Y.2d 708, 714 [1998]), that “whether defendant would have been acquitted of the charges but for counsel’s errors isrelevant, but not dispositive" under the Baldi standard such a finding is, in fact dispositive under People v Baldi (54 NY2d 137 [1981]), since "it is hard to envision a scenario where an error that meets the prejudice prong of… [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  The panel included Patricia Hruby Powell and Shadra Strickland, the author and illustrator, respectively, of a new and illustrated young people’s book titled Loving vs. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Background In 1983, a jury convicted Frank Spisak of murdering three people. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
But meaningful representation does not require perfection as held in People v Ford and People v Anderson. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:38 pm by Rory Little
Instead, the defendant must show “prejudice” under a reading of Strickland v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:10 pm
(Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at pp. 687, 693-694 [prejudice requires a "reasonable probability" that competent performance would have led to a different result].) [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
People, 871 P.2d 769, 772 (Colo. 1994) (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689); People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); another based on Cuyler v. [read post]